Can I unsugar list comprehension in this expression:
[(i,j) | i <- [1..4], j <- [i+1..4]]
This is the output:
[(1,2),(1,3),(1,4),(2,3),(2,4),(3,4)]
How can I, with map, filter and so on, write that piece of code?
edit
Here an other:
[(i,j,k) | i <- [1..6], j <- [i+1..6],k <- [j+1..6]]
This is the output:
[(1,2,3),(1,2,4),(1,2,5),(1,2,6),(1,3,4),(1,3,5),(1,3,6),(1,4,5),(1,4,6),(1,5,6),(2,3,4),(2,3,5),(2,3,6),(2,4,5),(2,4,6),(2,5,6),(3,4,5),(3,4,6),(3,5,6),(4,5,6)]
List comprehensions (in fact, Monad comprehensions) can be desugared into do
notation.
do i <- [1..4]
j <- [i+1..4]
return (i,j)
Which can be desugared as usual:
[1..4] >>= \i ->
[i+1..4] >>= \j ->
return (i,j)
It is well known that a >>= \x -> return b
is the same as fmap (\x -> b) a
. So an intermediate desugaring step:
[1..4] >>= \i ->
fmap (\j -> (i,j)) [i+1..4]
For lists, (>>=) = flip concatMap
, and fmap = map
(flip concatMap) [1..4] (\i -> map (\j -> (i,j) [i+1..4])
flip
simply switches the order of the inputs.
concatMap (\i -> map (\j -> (i,j)) [i+1..4]) [1..4]
And this is how you wind up with Tsuyoshi's answer.
The second can similarly be desugared into:
concatMap (\i ->
concatMap (\j ->
map (\k ->
(i,j,k))
[j+1..6])
[i+1..6])
[1..6]
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With