Referring to data.table columns by names saved in variables

Question

data.table is a fantastic R package and I am using it in a library I am developing. So far all is going very well, except for one complication. It seems to be much more difficult (compared to the conventional data frames) to refer to data.table columns using names saved in variables (as for data frames would be, for example: colname="col"; df[df[,colname]<5,colname]=0).

Perhaps what complicates the things most is the apparent lack of consistency of syntax on this in data.table. In some cases, eval(colname) and get(colname), or even c(colname) seem to work. In others, DT[,colname, with=F] is the solution. Yet in others, such as, for example, the set() and subset() functions, I haven't found a solution at all. Finally, an extreme, albeit also quite common use case was discussed earlier (passing column names to data.table programmatically) and the proposed solutions, albeit apparently doing their job, did not seem particularly readable...

Perhaps I am complicating things too much? If anyone could jot down a quick cheatsheet for referring to data.table column names using variables for different common scenarios, I would be very grateful.

UPDATE:

Some specific examples that work provided I can hard code column names:

x.short = subset(x, abs(dist)<=100) set(x, which(x$val<10), "val", 0)  

Now assume distcol="dist", valcol="val". What is the best way to do the above using distcol and valcol, but not dist and val?

Answer 1

If you are going to be doing complicated operations inside your j expressions, you should probably use eval and quote. One problem with that in current version of data.table is that the environment of eval is not always correctly processed - eval and quote in data.table (Note: There has been an update to that answer based on an update to the package.) - and the current fix for that is to add .SD to eval. As far as I can tell from a few tests that I've run this doesn't affect speed (the way e.g. having .SD[1] in j would).

Interestingly this issue only plagues the j and you'll be fine using eval normally in i (where .SD is not available anyway).

The other problem is assignment, and there you have to have strings. I know one way to extract the string name from a quoted expression - it's not pretty, but it works. Here's an example combining everything together:

x = data.table(dist = c(1:10), val = c(1:10)) distcol = quote(dist) valcol = quote(val)  x[eval(valcol) < 5,   capture.output(str(distcol, give.head = F)) := eval(distcol)*sum(eval(distcol, .SD))] 

Note how I was ok not adding .SD in one eval(distcol), but won't be if I take it out of the other eval.

Another option is to use get:

diststr = "dist" valstr = "val"  x[get(valstr) < 5, c(diststr) := get(diststr)*sum(get(diststr))]