I have a simple BASH command that looks like
for i in `seq 2`; do echo $i; done; > out.dat
When this runs the output of seq 2
is output to the terminal and nothing is output to the data file (out.dat)
I am expecting standard out to be redirected to out.dat like it does simply running the command seq 2 > out.dat
For utilizing the redirection of bash, execute any script, then define the > or >> operator followed by the file path to which the output should be redirected. “>>” operator is used for utilizing the command's output to a file, including the output to the file's current contents.
$() Command Substitution According to the official GNU Bash Reference manual: “Command substitution allows the output of a command to replace the command itself.
&1 is used to reference the value of the file descriptor 1 (stdout). both Standard output (stdout) and Standard Error (stderr) will redirected to output.
Nested loop definition That is to say, it is a loop that exists inside an outer loop. When you integrate nested loops in bash scripting, you are trying to make a command run inside another command. This is what it means: a bash nested for loop statement runs a command within another loop.
Remove your semicolon.
for i in `seq 2`; do echo "$i"; done > out.dat
SUGGESTIONS
Also as suggested by Fredrik Pihl, try not to use external binaries when they are not needed, or at least when practically not:
for i in {1..2}; do echo "$i"; done > out.dat for ((i = 1; i <= 2; ++i )); do echo "$i"; done > out.dat for i in 1 2; do echo "$i"; done > out.dat
Also, be careful of outputs in words
that may cause pathname expansion.
for a in $(echo '*'); do echo "$a"; done
Would show your files instead of just a literal *
.
$()
is also recommended as a clearer syntax for command substitution in Bash and POSIX shells than backticks (`
), and it supports nesting.
The cleaner solutions as well for reading output to variables are
while read var; do ... done < <(do something)
And
read ... < <(do something) ## Could be done on a loop or with readarray. for a in "${array[@]}"; do : done
Using printf can also be an easier alternative with respect to the intended function:
printf '%s\n' {1..2} > out.dat
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With