By default, ls lists just one directory. If you name one or more directories on the command line, ls will list each one. The -R (uppercase R) option lists all subdirectories, recursively.
Recursive Search To recursively search for a pattern, invoke grep with the -r option (or --recursive ). When this option is used grep will search through all files in the specified directory, skipping the symlinks that are encountered recursively.
How to list all files a folder recursively in command line ? With a ms dos prompt, to list all the files inside a folder. To do so, type the dir command to list the folder content with the recursive dedicated option.
ls -lR is to display all files, directories and sub directories of the current directory ls -lR | more is used to show all the files in a flow.
In windows, to list only directories:
dir /ad /b /s
to list all files (and no directories):
dir /a-d /b /s
redirect the output to a file:
dir /a-d /b /s > filename.txt
dir command parameters explained on wikipedia
in shell:
find . -type d
gives directories from current working directory, and:
find . -type f
gives files from current working directory.
Replace .
by your directory of interest.
Directories:
find ./ -type d
Files:
find ./ -type f
Directories:
find ./ -type d > somefile.txt
Files:
find ./ -type f > somefile.txt
On Windows, you can do it like this as most flexibile solution that allows you to additionally process dir names.
You use FOR /R to recursively execute batch commands.
Check out this batch file.
@echo off
SETLOCAL EnableDelayedExpansion
SET N=0
for /R %%i in (.) do (
SET DIR=%%i
::put anything here, for instance the following code add dir numbers.
SET /A N=!N!+1
echo !N! !DIR!
)
Similary for files you can add pattern as a set instead of dot, in your case
(*.*)
This is an old question, but I thought I'd add something anyhow.
DIR doesn't traverse correctly all the directory trees you want, in particular not the ones on C:. It simply gives up in places because of different protections.
ATTRIB works much better, because it finds more. (Why this difference? Why would MS make one utility work one way and another work different in this respect? Damned if I know.) In my experience the most effective way to handle this, although it's a kludge, is to get two listings:
attrib /s /d C:\ >%TEMP%\C-with-directories.txt
attrib /s C:\ >%TEMP%\C-without-directories.txt
and get the difference between them. That difference is the directories on C: (except the ones that are too well hidden). For C:, I'd usually do this running as administrator.
In Windows :
dir /ad /b /s
dir /a-d /b /s
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With