I am experimenting with OpenJML in combination with Z3, and I'm trying to reason about double
or float
values:
class Test {
//@ requires b > 0;
void a(double b) {
}
void b() {
a(2.4);
}
}
I have already found out OpenJML uses AUFLIA
as the default logic, which doesn't support reals
. I am now using AUFNIRA
.
Unfortunately, the tool is unable to prove this class:
→ java -jar openjml.jar -esc -prover z3_4_3 -exec ./z3 Test.java -noInternalSpecs -logic AUFNIRA
Test.java:8: warning: The prover cannot establish an assertion (Precondition: Test.java:3: ) in method b
a(2.4);
^
Test.java:3: warning: Associated declaration: Test.java:8:
//@ requires b > 0;
^
2 warnings
Why is this?
The SMT translation (used as input for z3
) appears to be faulty when doubles are involved. In Program B below, which uses doubles instead of ints, the constants for either the call or the pre-condition never get translated into SMT.
This is a fault of openjml
, not z3
- since z3
would need something of the form (define-fun _JML__tmp3 () Real 2345.0)
to work with (see verbose output of Program A), but openjml
never generates it. In general, floating point support seems to be buggy.
Program A (with ints):
class Test {
//@ requires b > 1234;
void a(int b) { }
void z() { a(2345); }
}
Output (running with -verbose | grep 234
, to search for mentions of 1234
or 2345
in the verbose output):
// requires b > 1234;
Pre_1 = b > 1234;
// requires b > 1234;
assume Assignment Pre_1_0_21___4 == b_55 > 1234;
(assert (= BL_58bodyBegin_2 (=> (= _JML___exception_49_49___1 NULL) (=> (= _JML___termination_49_49___2 0) (=> (distinct THIS NULL) (=> (or (= THIS NULL) (and (and (distinct THIS NULL) (javaSubType (javaTypeOf THIS) T_Test)) (jmlSubType (jmlTypeOf THIS) JMLT_Test))) (=> (and (<= (- 2147483648) b_55) (<= b_55 2147483647)) (=> (select _isalloc___0 THIS) (=> (= (select _alloc___0 THIS) 0) (=> (= Pre_1_0_21___3 false) (=> (= Pre_1_0_21___4 (> b_55 1234)) (=> Pre_1_0_21___4 BL_49_AfterLabel_3))))))))))))
a(2345);
// a(2345)
int _JML__tmp3 = 2345;
boolean _JML__tmp6 = _JML__tmp3 > 1234;
// a(2345)
int _JML__tmp3 = 2345
boolean _JML__tmp6 = _JML__tmp3 > 1234
(define-fun _JML__tmp3 () Int 2345)
(define-fun _JML__tmp6 () Bool (> _JML__tmp3 1234))
Result:
EXECUTION
Proof result is unsat
Method checked OK
[total 427ms]
Program B (with doubles):
class Test {
//@ requires b > 1234.0;
void a(double b) { }
void z() { a(2345.0); }
}
Output (running with -verbose | grep 234
, to search for mentions of 1234.0
or 2345.0
in the verbose output):
// requires b > 1234.0;
Pre_1 = b > 1234.0;
// requires b > 1234.0;
assume Assignment Pre_1_0_29___4 == b_72 > 1234.0;
a(2345.0);
// a(2345.0)
double _JML__tmp3 = 2345.0;
boolean _JML__tmp6 = _JML__tmp3 > 1234.0;
// a(2345.0)
double _JML__tmp3 = 2345.0
boolean _JML__tmp6 = _JML__tmp3 > 1234.0
void z() { a(2345.0); }
//@ requires b > 1234.0;
Test.java:4: a(2345.0)
VALUE: 2345.0 === 0.0
Result:
EXECUTION
Proof result is sat
Some assertion is not valid
Test.java:4: warning: The prover cannot establish an assertion (Precondition: Test.java:2: ) in method z
void z() { a(2345.0); }
^
Test.java:2: warning: Associated declaration: Test.java:4:
//@ requires b > 1234.0;
^
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With