I've created two regression models using a linear panel model with plm, and a generalized panel model using poisson with the pglm package.
library(plm); library(pglm)
data(Unions) # from pglm-package
punions <- pdata.frame(Unions, c("id", "year"))
fit1 <- plm(wage ~ exper + rural + married, data=punions, model="random")
fit2 <- pglm(wage ~ exper + rural + married, data=punions, model="random", family="poisson")
I now want to compare the two fits graphically by plotting the fitted values in a set of scatterplots. Preferably along these lines using ggplot2:
library(ggplot2)
ggplot(punions, aes(x=exper, y=wage)) +
geom_point() +
facet_wrap(rural ~ married)
I considered simply using ggplot2's stat_smooth()
, but (perhaps unsurprisingly) it doesn't seem to recognize the panel format of my data. Manually extracting the predicted values with predict
also does not seem to work for the pglm-model.
How do I overlay the predicted values for my two panel models in this plot?
Similar to @mtoto, I am also not familiar with either library(plm)
or library(pglm)
. But the predict method for plm
is available, it's just not exported. pglm
does not have a predict method.
R> methods(class= "plm")
[1] ercomp fixef has.intercept model.matrix pFtest plmtest plot pmodel.response
[9] pooltest predict residuals summary vcovBK vcovHC vcovSCC
R> methods(class= "pglm")
no methods found
Of note, I do not understand why you are using a Poisson model for the wage data. It's clearly not a Poisson distribution since it takes non-integer values (below). You could try a negative binomial if you wish, though I'm not sure that's available with random effects. But you could use MASS::glm.nb
for instance.
> quantile(Unions$wage, seq(0,1,.1))
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
0.02790139 2.87570334 3.54965422 4.14864865 4.71605855 5.31824370 6.01422463 6.87414349 7.88514525 9.59904809 57.50431282
plm
punions$p <- plm:::predict.plm(fit1, punions)
# From examining the source code, predict.plm does not incorporate
# the random effects, so you do not get appropriate predictions.
# You just get the FE predictions.
ggplot(punions, aes(x=exper, y=p)) +
geom_point() +
facet_wrap(rural ~ married)
lme4
Alternatively, you can get similar fits from the lme4
package, which does have a predict method defined:
library(lme4)
Unions$id <- factor(Unions$id)
fit3 <- lmer(wage ~ exper + rural + married + (1|id), data= Unions)
# not run:
fit4 <- glmer(wage ~ exper + rural + married + (1|id), data= Unions, family= poisson(link= "log"))
R> fit1$coefficients
(Intercept) exper ruralyes marriedyes
3.7467469 0.3088949 -0.2442846 0.4781113
R> fixef(fit3)
(Intercept) exper ruralyes marriedyes
3.7150302 0.3134898 -0.1950361 0.4592975
I haven't run the poisson models because it's clearly incorrectly specified. You could do some sort of variable transformation to handle it or perhaps a negative binomial. In any case, let's finish the example:
# this has RE for individuals, so you do see dispersion based on the RE
Unions$p <- predict(fit3, Unions)
ggplot(Unions, aes(x=exper, y=p)) +
geom_point() +
facet_wrap(rural ~ married)
I am not familiar with the pglm package, but there seems to be no function similar to predict()
that will generate a vector of future values from a data frame.
In all other cases (which should be all tbh), you can easily plot this in ggplot, even using facet wrap. You simply add the predictions to the data frame as new column:
punions$pred1 <- predict(fit1,punions,class="lm")
And then add it as an additional geom_line()
:
ggplot() + geom_point(data=punions, aes(x=exper, y=wage)) +
geom_line(data=punions,aes(x=exper, y= pred1), color = "red") +
facet_wrap(rural ~ married)
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With