I am using asyncore to implement a publish subscribe. I understand using twisted or ZMQ may be a better solution, however in this case it needs to be pure python. When waiting for connections the CPU usage is ~1%, as soon as a client connects the CPU usage jumps write up to 100%. It does not drop back down even after the client disconnects.
My server class:
class Host(asyncore.dispatcher):
log = logging.getLogger('Host')
def __init__(self, port=7655):
asyncore.dispatcher.__init__(self)
self.create_socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
self.set_reuse_addr()
self.bind(('0.0.0.0', port,))
self.listen(5)
self.clients = []
def handle_accept(self):
socket, addr = self.accept()
self.log.info("Aceepted client at {0}:{1}".format(addr[0], addr[1]))
self.clients.append(RemoteClient(self, socket, addr))
def broadcast(self, message):
self.log.info("Broadcasting message: {0}".format(message))
for client in self.clients:
client.message(message)
And my handler:
class RemoteClient(asyncore.dispatcher):
log = logging.getLogger('Host')
def __init__(self, host, socket, address):
asyncore.dispatcher.__init__(self, socket)
self.host = host
self.outbox = collections.deque()
def message(self, message):
self.outbox.append(message)
def handle_write(self):
if not self.outbox:
return
message = self.outbox.popleft()
if len(message) > MAX_MESSAGE_LENGTH:
raise ValueError('Message too long')
self.send(message)
def handle_close(self):
self.host.clients.remove(self)
self.log.info("Client removed from list")
self.close()
def handle_error(self):
self.log.error("Socket error")
I have tried hunting for a solution but can't seem to work out what is going on. Any help appreciated!
Your problem is that you don't override method asyncore.dispatcher.writeable
, default implementation:
def writable(self):
return True
Which causes asyncore.poll
to run in while True
loop (thus using 100% CPU):
def poll(timeout=0.0, map=None):
if map is None:
map = socket_map
if map:
r = []; w = []; e = []
for fd, obj in map.items():
is_r = obj.readable()
is_w = obj.writable() # This is always true
if is_r:
r.append(fd)
if is_w:
w.append(fd)
if is_r or is_w:
e.append(fd) # This always happens
if [] == r == w == e:
time.sleep(timeout) # This never happens
return
try:
# Here, having w (as function parameter) set to non-empty value
# causes select to immediately return without waiting with w set
# just to your client
r, w, e = select.select(r, w, e, timeout)
I think really clean solution would be re-implementing asyncore with some sort of threading.Event
mechanism that would enforce waiting for writable object, but so far this worked for me:
# Add to RemoteClient
def writable(self):
''' It has point to call handle_write only when there's something in outbox
Having this method always returning true will cause 100% CPU usage
'''
return bool(self.outbox)
# When you start loop
asyncore.loop(timeout=5.0)
You also can see writable()
overridden in example in official documentation.
I just prefer to be able to kill waiting sooner than after 30 seconds.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With