I'm trying to run a pyomo
optimization and I get the error message [Error 6] The handle is invalid
. Not sure how to interpret it, looking around it seems to have something to do with privileges but I don't really understand it.
Find below the complete error trace and also a toy example to reproduce it.
Full error trace:
Error in py_run_file_impl(file, local, convert) : ApplicationError: Could not execute the command: 'C:\Users\xxx\AppData\Local\Continuum\anaconda3\envs\lucy\Library\bin\ipopt.exe c:\users\xxx\appdata\local\temp\tmpp2hmid.pyomo.nl -AMPL' Error message: [Error 6] The handle is invalid
Detailed traceback: File "", line 46, in File "C:\Users\xxx\AppData\Local\CONTIN~1\ANACON~1\envs\lucy\lib\site-packages\pyomo\opt\base\solvers.py", line 578, in solve _status = self._apply_solver() File "C:\Users\xxx\AppData\Local\CONTIN~1\ANACON~1\envs\lucy\lib\site-packages\pyomo\opt\solver\shellcmd.py", line 246, in _apply_solver self._rc, self._log = self._execute_command(self._command) File "C:\Users\xxx\AppData\Local\CONTIN~1\ANACON~1\envs\lucy\lib\site-packages\pyomo\opt\solver\shellcmd.py", line 309, in _execute_command tee = self._tee File "C:\Users\xxx\AppData\Local\CONTIN~1\ANACON~1\envs\lucy\lib\site-packages\pyutilib\subprocess\processmngr.py", line 660, in run_command
Reproducible example based on this.
Pure python code (it works when I run it in python, in the conda
environment called "lucy"):
from pyomo.environ import *
infinity = float('inf')
model = AbstractModel()
# Foods
model.F = Set()
# Nutrients
model.N = Set()
# Cost of each food
model.c = Param(model.F, within=PositiveReals)
# Amount of nutrient in each food
model.a = Param(model.F, model.N, within=NonNegativeReals)
# Lower and upper bound on each nutrient
model.Nmin = Param(model.N, within=NonNegativeReals, default=0.0)
model.Nmax = Param(model.N, within=NonNegativeReals, default=infinity)
# Volume per serving of food
model.V = Param(model.F, within=PositiveReals)
# Maximum volume of food consumed
model.Vmax = Param(within=PositiveReals)
# Number of servings consumed of each food
model.x = Var(model.F, within=NonNegativeIntegers)
# Minimize the cost of food that is consumed
def cost_rule(model):
return sum(model.c[i]*model.x[i] for i in model.F)
model.cost = Objective(rule=cost_rule)
# Limit nutrient consumption for each nutrient
def nutrient_rule(model, j):
value = sum(model.a[i,j]*model.x[i] for i in model.F)
return model.Nmin[j] <= value <= model.Nmax[j]
model.nutrient_limit = Constraint(model.N, rule=nutrient_rule)
# Limit the volume of food consumed
def volume_rule(model):
return sum(model.V[i]*model.x[i] for i in model.F) <= model.Vmax
model.volume = Constraint(rule=volume_rule)
opt = SolverFactory('ipopt')
instance = model.create_instance('diet.dat')
results = opt.solve(instance, tee=False)
results
The code to run it in R with reticulate
is pretty straightforward:
library(reticulate)
use_condaenv(condaenv = "lucy")
py_run_file("../pyomo_scripts/test.py")
And finally for completeness this is the diet.dat
file (must be at the same path as the python/R files):
param: F: c V :=
"Cheeseburger" 1.84 4.0
"Ham Sandwich" 2.19 7.5
"Hamburger" 1.84 3.5
"Fish Sandwich" 1.44 5.0
"Chicken Sandwich" 2.29 7.3
"Fries" .77 2.6
"Sausage Biscuit" 1.29 4.1
"Lowfat Milk" .60 8.0
"Orange Juice" .72 12.0 ;
param Vmax := 75.0;
param: N: Nmin Nmax :=
Cal 2000 .
Carbo 350 375
Protein 55 .
VitA 100 .
VitC 100 .
Calc 100 .
Iron 100 . ;
param a:
Cal Carbo Protein VitA VitC Calc Iron :=
"Cheeseburger" 510 34 28 15 6 30 20
"Ham Sandwich" 370 35 24 15 10 20 20
"Hamburger" 500 42 25 6 2 25 20
"Fish Sandwich" 370 38 14 2 0 15 10
"Chicken Sandwich" 400 42 31 8 15 15 8
"Fries" 220 26 3 0 15 0 2
"Sausage Biscuit" 345 27 15 4 0 20 15
"Lowfat Milk" 110 12 9 10 4 30 0
"Orange Juice" 80 20 1 2 120 2 2 ;
edit after comments:
These are the versions for pyomo
and ipopt
pyomo 5.6.4 py36_0 conda-forge
pyomo.extras 3.3 py36_182212 conda-forge
ipopt 3.11.1 2 conda-forge
I have inherited loads of code in R with the optimization done in pyomo
through system calls. I'm trying to improve it by using reticulate
so that I avoid writing and reading files and I have more control... if I still have do system calls within python, I will gain very little by using reticulate
.
Thanks.
I can not say I understand this problem entirely, however it is a very interesting one to research, mainly because I got a different error message
TypeError: signal handler must be signal.SIG_IGN, signal.SIG_DFL, or a callable object
and while I got the error every time I ran py_run_file("test.py")
in a new r session, by the second run there was no error.
That being said I believe it is related to this issue: https://github.com/PyUtilib/pyutilib/issues/31
I didn't face any problem after adding the two lines :
import pyutilib.subprocess.GlobalData
pyutilib.subprocess.GlobalData.DEFINE_SIGNAL_HANDLERS_DEFAULT = False
in the python script before invoking the solver.
Hope this helps
If you can execute the python version, try to r session with administrative right with the following code
library("reticulate")
##-- your directory containing 'diet.py' and 'diet.dat'
setwd("D:/project/Dropbox/lectures/2104xxx scg_opt/src/02"")
##-- execute code
a <- py_run_file("diet.py",local=T)
a$results
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With