I saw this question:
where I found out I can use purescript-debug to print it, e.g. by using:
> traceAny {a:1} id
{ a: 1 }
unit
I was wondering however what is the rationale behind not having a default Show
instance for records:
> {a:1}
Error found:
in module $PSCI
No type class instance was found for
Data.Show.Show { "a" :: Int
}
Show
is just implemented as library code, so there's no way an instance can be written that can accomodate every possible record. There would need to be some kind of constraint where you could say "the type of every value in this record must also have a Show
instance", for example. The actual implementation would need to be somewhat magic too, since you can't iterate over the labels in a record either.
There have been a few discussions about reforming Show
, such as this one, that would potentially solve this, by making Show
entirely magic, and only usable for debugging purposes.
Although this doesn't really solve the case you have here, it is possible to rely on Generic
deriving to make a Show
instance for a newtype
'd record, which can take some of the pain out of this kind of thing:
import Data.Generic (class Generic, gShow)
newtype MyRecord = MyRecord { a :: Int }
derive instance genericMyRecord :: Generic MyRecord
instance showMyRecord :: Show MyRecord where
show = gShow
And if you derive Newtype
too it makes the record easier to work with as you can use the various operations that help with wrapping/unwrapping/operating under the newtype, etc.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With