pure-specifier on function-definition

Question

While compiling on GCC I get the error: pure-specifier on function-definition, but not when I compile the same code using VS2005.

class Dummy {      //error: pure-specifier on function-definition, VS2005 compiles    virtual void Process() = 0 {}; }; 

But when the definition of this pure virtual function is not inline, it works:

class Dummy {   virtual void Process() = 0; }; void Dummy::Process() {} //compiles on both GCC and VS2005 

What does the error means? Why cannot I do it inline? Is it legal to evade the compile issue as shown in the second code sample?

Answer 1

Ok, I've just learned something. A pure virtual function must be declared as follows:

 class Abstract  { public:    virtual void pure_virtual() = 0; }; 

It may have a body, although it is illegal to include it at the point of declaration. This means that to have a body the pure virtual function must be defined outside the class. Note that even if it has a body, the function must still be overridden by any concrete classes derived from Abstract. They would just have an option to call Abstract::pure_virtual() explicitly if they need to.

The details are here.