So jQuery 1.6 has the new function prop()
.
$(selector).click(function(){ //instead of: this.getAttribute('style'); //do i use: $(this).prop('style'); //or: $(this).attr('style'); })
or in this case do they do the same thing?
And if I do have to switch to using prop()
, all the old attr()
calls will break if i switch to 1.6?
UPDATE
selector = '#id' $(selector).click(function() { //instead of: var getAtt = this.getAttribute('style'); //do i use: var thisProp = $(this).prop('style'); //or: var thisAttr = $(this).attr('style'); console.log(getAtt, thisProp, thisAttr); });
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.6.0/jquery.min.js"></script> <div id='id' style="color: red;background: orange;">test</div>
(see also this fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/maniator/JpUF2/)
The console logs the getAttribute
as a string, and the attr
as a string, but the prop
as a CSSStyleDeclaration
, Why? And how does that affect my coding in the future?
Update 1 November 2012
My original answer applies specifically to jQuery 1.6. My advice remains the same but jQuery 1.6.1 changed things slightly: in the face of the predicted pile of broken websites, the jQuery team reverted attr()
to something close to (but not exactly the same as) its old behaviour for Boolean attributes. John Resig also blogged about it. I can see the difficulty they were in but still disagree with his recommendation to prefer attr()
.
Original answer
If you've only ever used jQuery and not the DOM directly, this could be a confusing change, although it is definitely an improvement conceptually. Not so good for the bazillions of sites using jQuery that will break as a result of this change though.
I'll summarize the main issues:
prop()
rather than attr()
.prop()
does what attr()
used to do. Replacing calls to attr()
with prop()
in your code will generally work.checked
property is a Boolean, the style
property is an object with individual properties for each style, the size
property is a number.value
and checked
: for these attributes, the property always represents the current state while the attribute (except in old versions of IE) corresponds to the default value/checkedness of the input (reflected in the defaultValue
/ defaultChecked
property).If you're a jQuery developer and are confused by this whole business about properties and attributes, you need to take a step back and learn a little about it, since jQuery is no longer trying so hard to shield you from this stuff. For the authoritative but somewhat dry word on the subject, there's the specs: DOM4, HTML DOM, DOM Level 2, DOM Level 3. Mozilla's DOM documentation is valid for most modern browsers and is easier to read than the specs, so you may find their DOM reference helpful. There's a section on element properties.
As an example of how properties are simpler to deal with than attributes, consider a checkbox that is initially checked. Here are two possible pieces of valid HTML to do this:
<input id="cb" type="checkbox" checked> <input id="cb" type="checkbox" checked="checked">
So, how do you find out if the checkbox is checked with jQuery? Look on Stack Overflow and you'll commonly find the following suggestions:
if ( $("#cb").attr("checked") === true ) {...}
if ( $("#cb").attr("checked") == "checked" ) {...}
if ( $("#cb").is(":checked") ) {...}
This is actually the simplest thing in the world to do with the checked
Boolean property, which has existed and worked flawlessly in every major scriptable browser since 1995:
if (document.getElementById("cb").checked) {...}
The property also makes checking or unchecking the checkbox trivial:
document.getElementById("cb").checked = false
In jQuery 1.6, this unambiguously becomes
$("#cb").prop("checked", false)
The idea of using the checked
attribute for scripting a checkbox is unhelpful and unnecessary. The property is what you need.
checked
attributeIf you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With