I put a bunch of runnable objects into an ExecutorService:
// simplified content of main method ExecutorService threadPool = Executors.newCachedThreadPool(); for(int i = 0; i < workerCount; i++) { threadPool.execute(new Worker()); }
I would expect my program/process to stop immediately after all workers are done. But according to my log, it takes another 20-30 seconds until that happens. The workers do not allocate any resources, in fact, they do nothing at the moment.
Don't get me wrong, this is not a crucial problem for me, I'm just trying to understand what is happening and I'm wondering if this is normal behavior.
Using shutdown() and awaitTermination() In general, the ExecutorService will not be automatically destroyed when there is no task to process. It will stay alive and wait for new tasks to come.
When using an Executor, we can shut it down by calling the shutdown() or shutdownNow() methods. Although, it won't wait until all threads stop executing. Waiting for existing threads to complete their execution can be achieved by using the awaitTermination() method.
Two different methods are provided for shutting down an ExecutorService. The shutdown() method will allow previously submitted tasks to execute before terminating, while the shutdownNow() method prevents waiting tasks from starting and attempts to stop currently executing tasks.
ExecutorService must be shutdown explicitly to reclaim the resources (CPU & Memory) occupied by threads which have already finished their job but still exist.
Executors.newCachedThreadPool()
uses Executors.defaultThreadFactory()
for its ThreadFactory
. defaultThreadFactory
's javadocs say that "each new thread is created as a non-daemon thread" (emphasis added). So, the threads created for the newCachedThreadPool
are non-daemon. That means that they'll prevent the JVM from exiting naturally (by "naturally" I mean that you can still call System.exit(1)
or kill the program to cause the JVM to halt).
The reason the app finishes at all is that each thread created within the newCachedThreadPool
times out and closes itself after some time of inactivity. When the last one of them closes itself, if your application doesn't have any non-daemon threads left, it'll quit.
You can (and should) close the ExecutorService
down manually via shutdown
or shutdownNow
.
See also the JavaDoc for Thread, which talks about daemon-ness.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With