Why is the default access modifier in JUnit 5 package-private?
Tests in JUnit 4 had to be public.
What is the benefit of changing it to package-private?
If a class has no modifier (the default, also known as package-private), it is visible only within its own package (packages are named groups of related classes — you will learn about them in a later lesson.)
Private modifier is the most restricted modifier among all modifiers. Protected modifier is more accessible than the package and private modifier but less accessible than public modifier. Package modifier is more restricted than the public and protected modifier but less restricted than the private modifier.
2.3. Test classes, test methods, and lifecycle methods are not required to be public , but they must not be private .
The default access modifier is also called package-private, which means that all members are visible within the same package but aren't accessible from other packages: package com.
Why is the default access modifier in JUnit 5 package-private?
It's not the "default". There technically is no default. Rather, in JUnit Jupiter you have a choice: public
, protected
or package-private.
What is the benefit of changing it to package-private?
The benefit is that you don't have type public
anymore. If your IDE automatically generates test methods and test classes for you that are public
, feel free to leave them public
.
But... if you are typing in the methods on your own, then just leave off public
unless you are designing your test classes for subclassing from other packages, in which case you'd want to make your overrideable test methods either public
or protected
. And of course, interface default
methods must be public
.
Long story, short: we (the JUnit 5 team) believe in the principle "Less is more", meaning the less you have to type to achieve your goal, the better!
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With