Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Problems with FindBugs exclude filter

Tags:

java

findbugs

I am in the process of evaluating FindBugs and am trying to make use of the excludeFilter so that the tool does not process the test packages or the generated ejb stubs.

I have tried the following:

<FindBugsFilter>
<!-- Match any test packages -->
<Match>
    <Package name="~.*\.test"/>
</Match>
<Match>
    <Or>
        <Class name="~.*\.^_*"/>
        <Class name="~.*EJS*"/>
    </Or>
    <Bug pattern="MALICIOUS_CODE"/>
</Match>

The generated EJB's are still being looked at. Can someone provide some better direction on this.

I want to exclude out all classes that start with "_"

Example:

com/mycompany/business/admin/ejb/_AdminRemoteHome_Stub.java

com/mycompany/business/admin/ejb/_EJSRemoteStatelessAdminHome_054d51b9_Tie.java

Updated filter file.

I change the filter file to the following structure using the suggested regx changes and now things are working as expected:

<FindBugsFilter>
<!-- Match any test packages -->
<Match>
    <Package name="~.*\.test"/>
</Match>
<Match>
    <Class name="~.*\._.*"/>
</Match>
<Match>
    <Class name="~.*?EJS.*"/>       
</Match>

Looks like I need to go back and brush up on my regx.

like image 913
boyd4715 Avatar asked Jul 02 '09 10:07

boyd4715


2 Answers

Regarding FindBugFilter,

(just to be sure) are you sure you are considering the compiled class files directories, and not the sourcePath? (as mentioned in this SO answer).

From the Java element name matching section:

If the name attribute of Class, Method or Field starts with the ~ character the rest of attribute content is interpreted as a Java regular expression that is matched against the names of the Java element in question.

Would the following regex be more accurate?

    <Class name="~.*\._.*"/>
    <Class name="~.*?EJS.*"/>
  • ".*\._.*" instead of ".*\.^_*" because the anchor is supposed to match at the start of the string the regex pattern is applied to.

  • ".*?EJS.*" instead of ".*EJS*" because the ? quantifier makes the matching lazy, avoiding to 'eat' EJS. (Plus "S*" means "0 or n S", which does not help here)

like image 200
VonC Avatar answered Oct 31 '22 23:10

VonC


My findbugs exclude file was not working as above. I'm using the findbugs-maven-plugin v3.0.0. To resolve the issue I ran a build which generated findbugsXml.xml, then issued:

mvn findbugs:gui

This starts the User Interface to findbugs. I then loaded the findbugsXml.xml file, navigated to the warnings I desired excluded, excluded them and then saved the exclusions to findbugs_exclude.xml. I added this to the maven plugin as

<excludeFilterFile>findbugs_exclude.xml</excludeFilterFile>

The generated file works and the exclusions are truly omitted from the findbugs report.

Another great tip I found for the maven plugin was to add:

<omitVisitors>UnreadFields</omitVisitors>
like image 41
anonymous Avatar answered Oct 31 '22 21:10

anonymous