I am working on a WPF application using Entity Framework 4.0. When I tried to save the object, I got a primary key exception, but the primary key is an AutoIncremented field and I cannot understand the reason for the exception.
So after trying this and that, and a little debugging and using the SQL profiler, I found out that prior to inserting my object, a record must be inserted in the parent table, as I set the navigation property of that object.
So the crux is if an attempt to insert Employee object and set its department as Employee.Department = deptObject, then a new record is set to be inserted on department object.
Kindly suggest me someway by which navigational property objects won't be inserted in the database, any property or any method, Anything.
Thanks
. Clear() method is very good. It deletes all navigation properties in database. That's simple rather than foreach loop.
A navigation property is an optional property on an entity type that allows for navigation from one end of an association to the other end. Unlike other properties, navigation properties do not carry data. A navigation property definition includes the following: A name.
If you define your navigation property virtual , Entity Framework will at runtime create a new class (dynamic proxy) derived from your class and uses it instead of your original class. This new dynamically created class contains logic to load the navigation property when accessed for the first time.
Basically a scalar property is mapped to a column (int, string, ...) A navigation property is mapped to a relation. e.g Order. OrderDetails brings you to all ORderDetails of a specific order.
This is the way how EF works if you incorrectly use detached entities. I suppose you are using something like this:
var employee = new Employee();
employee.Department = GetDepartmentFromSomewhere(departmentId);
...
using (var context = new YourContext())
{
context.Employees.AddObject(employee);
context.SaveChanges();
}
This code prepared employee entity, added reference to existing department and saved new employee to the database. Where is the problem? The problem is that AddObject
doesn't add only employee but whole object graph. That is how EF works - you cannot have object graph where part of objects are connected to context and part of not. AddObject
adds every object in the graph as a new one (new one = insert in database). So you must either change sequence of your operations or fix state of entities manually so that your context knows that department already exists.
First solution - use the same context for loading department and saving employee:
using (var context = new YourContext())
{
var employee = new Employee();
...
context.Employees.AddObject(employee);
employee.Department = context.Departments.Single(d => d.Id == departmentId);
context.SaveChanges();
}
Second solution - connect entities to the context separately and after that make reference between entities:
var employee = new Employee();
...
var department = GetDepartmentFromSomewhere(departmentId);
using (var context = new YourContext())
{
context.Employees.AddObject(employee);
context.Departments.Attach(department);
employee.Department = department;
context.SaveChanges();
}
Third solution - correct state of the department manually so that context doesn't insert it again:
var employee = new Employee();
employee.Department = GetDepartmentFromSomewhere(departmentId);
...
using (var context = new YourContext())
{
context.Employees.AddObject(employee);
context.ObjectStateManager.ChangeObjectState(employee.Department,
EntityState.Unchanged);
context.SaveChanges();
}
I would like to add a 4th solution to in addition to the 3 solutions already provided in Ladislavs great answer. In facts its a detailed version of the short answer from Naor. I am working with entity framework version 6.
Assign the deparment id to the employee instead of department object
I tend to have a "foreign key value" property in addition to the navigation property in my model classes.
So on the Employee
class I have a Department
property and also an DepartmentId
of type int (make the int nullable if its possible that an Employee
has no Department
):
public class Employee
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public String EmployeeName { get; set; }
#region FK properties
public Department Department { get; set; }
public int? DepartmentId { get; set; }
#endregion
}
Would you could do now is just setting the DepartmentId
:
So instead of:
employee.Department = departmentObject;
just set:
employee.DepartmentId = departmentObject.Id;
or
employee.DepartmentId = departmentid
Now when calling SaveChanges
on the added employee, only the employee gets saved and no new department is created. But the reference from Employee
to Department
is set correctly because of the assigned department id.
More info
I usually would access the Department
object of the Employee
class only when reading / processing employees.
When creating or updating employees, I would use the DepartmentId
property of the Employee
class to assign to.
Not assigning to the Department
property of the Employee
has one downside: It could make debugging more difficult, because before calling SaveChanges
and re-reading the employees it would not be possible to see or use the Department
object of the Employee
.
Fixing entity state info in EF6
This refers to Ladislavs solution number 3.
With EF6 it is done that way:
_context.Entry(employee.Department).State = EntityState.Unchanged;
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With