Menu
I have tried to find some data on performance of these two targets compared, but did not succeed. I am interested in a asp.net5 web application that runs on Windows (Or azure web app e.g.). Is there any significant difference in performance or from that point of view the targets are roughly equal?
928
. NET Core is a lot faster than the . NET Framework due to its modular architecture. It offers lighter versions of core framework components leading to simplified cross-platform app development.
NET Core is faster than . NET Framework because the architecture of . NET Core is written or restructured from scratch to make it a modular, lightweight, fast, and cross-platform Framework. The Applications require technologies like workflow, webforms or WCF that are not present in .
In order to run ASP.NET Core Apps on the . NET Framework it needs to only reference . Core NuGet packages which contains only the . NET Standard 2.0 builds.
Just like ASP.NET, ASP.NET Core is based on the Model-View-Controller framework, like most web development frameworks; ASP.NET Core has robust Cloud support, and it supports modular architecture better than ASP.NET does.
As far as benchmarks are concerned, they can all be found on GitHub on aspnet/benchmarks
They even include the tools and procedure to run the benchmark yourself on your system.
So far, ASP.NET 4.6 is able to handle 57,843 requests per seconds. And ASP.NET 5 on Kestrel can handle 168,005 requests per seconds.
As for performance differences, you might be interested in all the bugs currently open:
Lots of work needs to be done before RTM.
186
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With
