The basic Google search bigobj issue shows that a lot of people are experiencing the Fatal Error C1128: "number of sections exceeded object file format limit : compile with /bigobj". The error has more chance to occur if one heavily uses a library of C++ templates, like Boost libraries or CGAL libraries.
That error is strange, because it gives the solution to itself: set the compiler flag /bigobj
!
So here is my question: why is not that flag set by default? There must be a penalty of using that flag, otherwise it would be set by default. That penalty is not documented in MSDN. Does anybody have a clue?
I ask the question because I wonder if the configuration system of CGAL should not set /bigobj
by default.
The documentation does mention an important drawback to /bigobj
:
Linkers that shipped prior to Visual C++ 2005 cannot read .obj files that were produced with
/bigobj
.
So, setting this option by default would restrict the number of linkers that can consume the resulting object files. Better to activate it on a need-to basis.
why is not that flag set by default? There must be a penalty of using that flag, otherwise it would be set by default.
My quick informal experiment shows .obj files to be about 2% larger with /bigobj
than without. So it's a small penalty but it's not zero.
Someone submitted a feature request to make /bigobj
the default; see https://developercommunity.visualstudio.com/t/Enable-bigobj-by-default/1031214.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With