The following two functions behave differently when given an empty string:
guardMatch l@(x:xs)
| x == '-' = "negative " ++ xs
| otherwise = l
patternMatch ('-':xs) = "negative " ++ xs
patternMatch l = l
Here my output:
*Main> guardMatch ""
"*** Exception: matching.hs:(1,1)-(3,20): Non-exhaustive patterns in function guardMatch
*Main> patternMatch ""
""
Question: why does not the 'otherwise' close catch the empty string?
The otherwise
is within the scope of the pattern l@(x:xs)
, which can only match a non-empty string. It might help to see what this (effectively) translates to internally:
guardMatch l = case l of
(x :xs) -> if x == '-' then "negative " ++ xs else l
patternMatch l = case l of
('-':xs) -> "negative " ++ xs
_ -> l
(Actually, I think the if
is translated to a case
+ guard instead of the other way around.)
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With