I continue to investigate extensible records as in Passing a Shapeless Extensible Record to a Function (continued): the provided solution works with functions that all takes a parameter that includes at least foo1, foo2, and foo3; that is one can write:
fun1(("foo1" ->> "hello") :: ("foo2" ->> 1) :: ("foo3" ->> 1.2) :: HNil)
fun1(("foo1" ->> "hello") :: ("foo2" ->> 1) :: ("foo3" ->> 1.2) :: ("foo4" ->> true) :: HNil)
and so on
And if we can add a second function fun2:
def fun2[L <: HList : HasMyFields](xs: L) = {
val selectors = implicitly[HasMyFields[L]]
import selectors._
xs("foo1").length + xs("foo2") + xs("foo3")
}
So far, so good.
Now, let's assume we have a set of fields foo1, foo2,... And a set of functions fun1, fun2, which take as parameter a record composed with any subset of {foo1, foo2,...}. For example, fun1 could take as parameter a record that contains foo1 and foo3 but not necessarily foo2, fun2 would expects a record with at least foo4 and so on.
Is there a way to avoid to declare as many class like HasMyFields as they are possible combinations (if we have n fields, there are 2**n combinations!)?
This is a lot easier without an additional type class with the new-ish Witness
syntax:
import shapeless._, ops.record.Selector, record._, syntax.singleton._
// Uses "foo1" and "foo2" fields; note that we get the appropriate static types.
def fun1[L <: HList](l: L)(implicit
foo1: Selector.Aux[L, Witness.`"foo1"`.T, String],
foo2: Selector.Aux[L, Witness.`"foo2"`.T, Int]
): (String, Double) = (foo1(l), foo2(l))
And then if we have this record:
val rec = ("foo1" ->> "hello") :: ("foo2" ->> 1) :: ("foo3" ->> 1.2) :: HNil
We get this:
scala> fun1(rec)
res0: (String, Double) = (hello,1.0)
The new syntax allows us to avoid creating witness values separately, so it's pretty easy to just require the Selector
instances you need.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With