With reference to the following code
#include <utility>
#include <cassert>
template <typename T>
struct Wot;
template <int... ints>
struct Wot<std::index_sequence<ints...>> {};
int main() {
assert(sizeof(Wot<std::index_sequence<1, 2, 3>>) == 1);
}
This works on clang but does not work on gcc, when I change the type of the partial specialization to accept std::size_t
in the index sequence however it works.
Who is right? Clang or gcc?
See this in action here https://wandbox.org/permlink/5YkuimK1pH3aKJT4
gcc is right. This is exactly [temp.deduct.type]/18:
If
P
has a form that contains<i>
, and if the type ofi
differs from the type of the corresponding template parameter of the template named by the enclosing simple-template-id, deduction fails. IfP
has a form that contains[i]
, and if the type ofi
is not an integral type, deduction fails. [ Example:template<int i> class A { /* ... */ }; template<short s> void f(A<s>); void k1() { A<1> a; f(a); // error: deduction fails for conversion from int to short f<1>(a); // OK } template<const short cs> class B { }; template<short s> void g(B<s>); void k2() { B<1> b; g(b); // OK: cv-qualifiers are ignored on template parameter types }
— end example ]
Mirroring the example and simplifying the original question:
template <class T> struct Wot { };
template <int... ints>
void foo(Wot<std::index_sequence<ints...>> ) { }
int main() {
foo(Wot<std::index_sequence<1, 2, 3>>{}); // error
foo<1, 2, 3>({}); // ok
}
I think this is clang bug 16279
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With