Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Overloading based on non-type template parameter

We are familiar with overloading based on function parameters. But why can't we have overloading based on non-type template parameters? With such overloading, you don't have to add extra function parameters just for overloading purposes, which may have a negative impact on runtime performance. Alas, the following code does not compile:

template <bool>
void func() {}

template <int>
void func() {}

int main() {
  func<0>();
}

The error message produced is

error: call of overloaded 'func()' is ambiguous
       func<0>();
               ^
note: candidate: void func() [with bool <anonymous> = false]
     void func() {}
          ^
note: candidate: void func() [with int <anonymous> = 0]
     void func() {}
          ^

Note that this may be more efficient than

void func(bool) {}

void func(int) {}

Is there any problem in allowing this usage?

like image 237
Lingxi Avatar asked Jan 24 '16 05:01

Lingxi


2 Answers

If you are open to a bit of added syntax, you can use:

// No default implementation.
template <typename T, T value> struct Impl;

// Implement the bool/true version
template <> struct Impl<bool, true>
{
   void operator()() {}
};

// Implement the bool/false version
template <> struct Impl<bool, false>
{
   void operator()() {}
};

// Implement the int version
template <int N> struct Impl<int, N>
{
   void operator()() {}
};

template <typename T, T value>
void func()
{
   Impl<T, value>()();
};

int main()
{
   func<bool, true>();
   func<int, 10>();
}

Disclaimer

I have no idea whether this will perform better than calling func(true).

like image 157
R Sahu Avatar answered Sep 20 '22 16:09

R Sahu


Andrei Alexandrescu wrote about this in "Modern C++ Design", IIUC, and it looks like std::integral_constant can basically give nearly the effect you want, no? What would be the major improvements over the following? It basically allows to overload on (at least integral types of) constants.

#include <type_traits>


using tt = std::integral_constant<bool, true>;
constexpr tt t;
using ft = std::integral_constant<bool, false>;
constexpr ft f;


void func(tt) {};

void func(ft) {};


int main()
{
    func(t);
    return 0;
}
like image 35
Ami Tavory Avatar answered Sep 19 '22 16:09

Ami Tavory