Trying to understand Ocaml's mechanism for named parameters. I understand the basics, but the doc shows an example like this:
# let f ~x ~y = x - y;;
val f : x:int -> y:int -> int = <fun>
# let x = 3 and y = 2 in f ~x ~y;;
- : int = 1
What exactly is going on when only the tilde is used in application? Is it just shorthand for ~x:x
, similar to definitions? If so, can someone explain why this:
# ListLabels.fold_left;;
- : f:('a -> 'b -> 'a) -> init:'a -> 'b list -> 'a = <fun>
# let add = (+) and i = 0
in ListLabels.fold_left ~add ~i [1;2;3];;
produces
- : f:((add:(int -> int -> int) -> i:int -> 'a) ->
int -> add:(int -> int -> int) -> i:int -> 'a) ->
init:(add:(int -> int -> int) -> i:int -> 'a) -> 'a = <fun>
The man says "beware that functions like ListLabels.fold_left whose result type is a type variable will never be considered as totally applied."
Here is what happens in your example. Beware it's a bit involved.
# ListLabels.fold_left;;
- : f:('a -> 'b -> 'a) -> init:'a -> 'b list -> 'a = <fun>
is just the classic use: ListLabels.fold_left
taks 3 arguments, namely a function labeled f
, an initializer init
and a list.
Now, in
let add = (+) and i = 0
in ListLabels.fold_left ~add ~i [1;2;3];;
the application ListLabels.fold_left ~add ~i [1;2;3]
is considered incomplete (as the man says). That means that `ListLabels.fold_left
receives first its unamed argument, [1;2;3]
and returns a function of type f:('a -> int -> 'a) -> init:'a -> 'a
. Let us call this function foo.
Since you're giving two named arguments, labeled add
and i
, the type 'a
is inferred to be a functional type, of type add:'c -> ~i:'d -> 'e
.
Based on the type of the variables add
and i
, the type 'c
must be int -> int -> int
, and 'd
must be int
.
Replacing those values in the type 'a
, we derive that the type 'a
is add:(int -> int -> int) -> i:int -> 'e
.
And replacing this in the type of foo (I'm glad there is copy-pasting ;-), its type is
f:((add:(int -> int -> int) -> i:int -> 'e)
-> int
-> (add:(int -> int -> int) -> i:int -> 'e))
-> init:(add:(int -> int -> int) -> i:int -> 'e)
-> (add:(int -> int -> int) -> i:int -> 'e)
Removing unecessary parentheses, and alpha converting (i.e. renaming) 'e
to 'a
, we get
f:((add:(int -> int -> int) -> i:int -> 'a)
-> int
-> add:(int -> int -> int) -> i:int -> 'a)
-> init:(add:(int -> int -> int) -> i:int -> 'a)
-> add:(int -> int -> int) -> i:int -> 'a
That is the type of foo. But remember that you are passing two arguments to foo, labeled ~add
and ~i
. So the value you get at the end is not of type add:(int -> int -> int) -> i:int -> 'a
but indeed of type 'a
. And the whole type of your example is, as returned by the compiler,
f:((add:(int -> int -> int) -> i:int -> 'a)
-> int
-> add:(int -> int -> int) -> i:int -> 'a)
-> init:(add:(int -> int -> int) -> i:int -> 'a)
-> 'a
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With