There are a lot of questions on SO about static vs dynamic typing, but I haven't found a lot about a language having both. Let me explain.
It seems that dynamically typed languages have an edge when it comes to rapid prototyping, e.g. Python or Perl, while statically typed languages (like C++, OCaml) allow for more compile-time checks and optimizations. I'm wondering if there is a language that would allow both:
In C# the default is static typing, but you can write:
dynamic fooVar = new FooClass();
in which case fooVar
is dynamically typed.
It seems that OCaml with http://www.lexifi.com/blog/runtime-types also offer something like this.
Please no subjective advice about which language is best, only objective features!
Since C++ attaches values to types at compile, it follows that C++ is a statically typed language.
Python is both a strongly typed and a dynamically typed language. Strong typing means that variables do have a type and that the type matters when performing operations on a variable. Dynamic typing means that the type of the variable is determined only during runtime.
C# and Java are often considered examples of statically typed languages, while Python, Ruby and JavaScript are examples of dynamically typed languages.
Java is statically-typed, so it expects its variables to be declared before they can be assigned values. Groovy is dynamically-typed and determines its variables' data types based on their values, so this line is not required.
Sure. It's called "gradual typing", and I would qualify it as trendy.
A cousin of "gradual typing" is "optional typing". In both cases, code with and without static types coexist. However, in "optional typing", the semantics of the language is completely agnostic of static types, while in "gradual typing" the semantics might consider static types, if they are available.
From the page of the course "Integrating Static and Dynamic Typing", I read they study
The design of recent languages that integrate static and dynamic typing, including Typed Racket (formerly Typed Scheme), C# 4.0, Diamondback Ruby, Haskell, Sage, and Thorn
You can add Dart to the list, which proposes optional typing as in the position paper Pluggable, Optional Type Systems.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With