What is the most efficient way of obtaining lists (as a vector
) of the keys and values from an unordered_map
?
For concreteness, suppose the map in question is a unordered_map<string, double>
. I'd then like to obtain the keys as a vector<string>
, and the values as a vector<double>
.
unordered_map<string, double> um; vector<string> vs = um.enum_keys(); vector<double> vd = um.enum_values();
I can just iterate across the map and collect the result, but is there a more efficient method? It would be nice to have a method that also works for regular map, since I might switch to that.
unordered_map at() in C++ Both key and value can be of any type predefined or user-defined. unordered_map :: at(): This function in C++ unordered_map returns the reference to the value with the element as key k.
C++ map find() function is used to find an element with the given key value k. If it finds the element then it returns an iterator pointing to the element. Otherwise, it returns an iterator pointing to the end of the map, i.e., map::end().
To check for the existence of a particular key in the map, the standard solution is to use the public member function find() of the ordered or the unordered map container, which returns an iterator to the key-value pair if the specified key is found, or iterator to the end of the container if the specified key is not ...
Returns a reference to the value that is mapped to a key equivalent to key, performing an insertion if such key does not already exist.
Okay, here you go:
std::vector<Key> keys; keys.reserve(map.size()); std::vector<Val> vals; vals.reserve(map.size()); for(auto kv : map) { keys.push_back(kv.first); vals.push_back(kv.second); }
Efficiency can probably be improved, but there it is. You're operating on two containers though, so there's not really any STL magic that can hide that fact.
As Louis said, this will work for any of the STL map
or set
containers.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With