Object instanceof Object
true
Object instanceof Function
true
Function instanceof Object
true
Function instanceof Function
true
so if Function is an Object and the Object is a Function how come
Function === Object
and Function == Object
are false?
I do understand that checking the instance of an object is not the same as comparison. So the question here is the fuzziness in the case where if two objects (which are actually types) are instances of each other, shouldn't the types be the same?
Note: Object is not an instance of a Number or an Array just an instance of Function.
From JavaScript Prototypal Inheritance:
Quite everything, in JavaScript, inherits from Object. We could say that Object is the super class, or better, the super constructor, of every variable and that everything is an instanceof Object. The Object constructor is a Function, but a Function is an instanceof Object. This means that these assertions are always true:
(Object instanceof Function) === (Function instanceof Object)
Above example is true because Object is a constructor, and a constructor in JavaScript is always a Function. At the same time, every Function has its own prototype, and a prototype always starts its inheritance from Object.prototype. The Function constructor, is a Function itself, and the function prototype is a function(){};
(Function.prototype instanceof Object) === (function(){} instanceof Object)
Everything is an Object
in JavaScript because JavaScript is an object-oriented language. Function
is an instance of Object
because everything is an instance of Object
. Simple enough. However, objects that initialize other objects (constructors) are also Function
s in JavaScript, so it would make sense for Object
to also be a Function
.
Think about this:
var obj = new Object();
Object
in this case is used as a Function
, is it not? So while, in theory, Object
should be the lowest-level object in the language, JavaScript cannot function without Function
s (pun!), so you need both to be at the same level. Object
needs to be an instance of Function
because it's a constructor and it needs to create more instances of itself.
function FooBar() {}
The FooBar
class above is an instance of both Object
and Function
, because it's both. The same logic applies to the built-in Object
and Function
objects; they're instances of both.
Phew, confusing. Did that make any sense?
I think this is more due to the unique way in which objects are defined. You don't define a type in javascript, you define a constructor. But you also do not define the constructor as a constructor, it's simply a function.
You can then refer to the types by the name of their constructor....which is just a function.
function Tiger(){ //function, or object?
}
function Apple(){ //function, or object?
}
Both could be objects, or perhaps just functions. Only the way you use them will determine that. So it kind of makes sense that at a low level, objects are functions and functions are objects, but there is still a difference, right?
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With