The numpy.dot docstring says:
For 2-D arrays it is equivalent to matrix multiplication, and for 1-D arrays to inner product of vectors (without complex conjugation). For N dimensions it is a sum product over the last axis of a and the second-to-last of b
But it doesn't illustrate how numpy.dot calculate 1-D array with 2-D array.So how does Numpy handle 1-D array(vector) with 2-D array(matrix)?
I have make some test:
In [27]: a
Out[27]:
array([[0, 1, 2],
[3, 4, 5],
[6, 7, 8]])
In [28]: b
Out[28]: array([0, 1, 2])
In [29]: np.dot(a,b)
Out[29]: array([ 5, 14, 23])
In [30]: np.dot(a, b.reshape(-1,1))
Out[30]:
array([[ 5],
[14],
[23]])
In [31]: np.dot(a, b.reshape(-1,1)).ravel() # same as np.dot(a,b)
Out[31]: array([ 5, 14, 23])
In [32]: np.dot(b,a)
Out[32]: array([15, 18, 21])
In [33]: np.dot(b.reshape(1,-1), a)
Out[33]: array([[15, 18, 21]])
In [34]: np.dot(b.reshape(1,-1), a).ravel() # same as np.dot(b,a)
Out[34]: array([15, 18, 21])
The above tests indecate that numpy.dot can handle 1-D array with 2-D array. Is it right?
A 1-d array and a 2-d array are handled as a matrix-vector (or vector-matrix) product. The implementation in fact uses the BLAS *gemv
functions to handle this case for floating-point inputs.
There's only one case not explicitly described in the documentation, but kind of hinted, which is how to apply to a 2D and a 1D inputs the rule:
it is a sum product over the last axis of a and the second-to-last of b
In your case, when you do np.dot(a, b)
, there is no "second-to-last" axis of b
. What numpy does then, is to settle for the last. So it does the sum product of every row of a
with b
, as your test readily shows.
All of your other examples fit into the above rule.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With