I do have a matrix with observations in rows (measurements at differnt pH) with data points as columns (concentration over time). So one row consists of differnt data points for one pH.
I do want to fit an ODE to the data. So i defined a cost function and would like to calculate the sum of squares for all observatoins. Taking the sum of sqares for this matrix should work like:
res = y - yhat # calculate residuals
ssq = np.diag(np.dot(res.T,res)) # sum over the diagonal
is that correct ?
The most pythonic way would be to use ** 2 which also square my array. import numpy as np my_array = np.array ( [1, 2, 3, 4]) squared_array = my_array ** 2 print (f"My array is equal to {my_array}") print (f"Squared array is equal to {squared_array}") These are 3 different ways to square a matrix using Numpy.
In this section, we will learn about the python numpy sum of squares. Numpy. square () function helps the user to calculate the square value of each element in the array. This function is used to sum all elements, the sum of each row, and the sum of each column of a given array. In this section, we will learn about the python NumPy sum 3d array.
In this program, we will add all the terms of a numpy matrix using the sum () function in the numpy library. We will first create a random numpy matrix and then, we will obtain the sum of all the elements. Step 1: Import numpy. Step 2: Create a random m×n matrix using the random () function.
matrix.sum(axis=None, dtype=None, out=None) [source] ¶. Returns the sum of the matrix elements, along the given axis. Refer to numpy.sum for full documentation. See also. numpy.sum. Notes. This is the same as ndarray.sum, except that where an ndarray would be returned, a matrix object is returned instead. Examples.
If you would take the sum of the last array it would be correct. But it's also unnecessarily complex (because the off-diagonal elements are also calculated with np.dot) Faster is:
ssq = np.sum(res**2)
If you want the ssd for each experiment, you can do:
ssq = np.sum(res**2, axis=1)
Performance comparison follow-up, that fastest method I've found is to do the math directly:
res[:, 0]**2 + res[:, 1]**2 + res[:, 2]**2
import numpy as np
import perfplot
perfplot.live(
setup=lambda n: np.random.randn(n, 3),
kernels=[
lambda a: a[:, 0]**2 + a[:, 1]**2 + a[:, 2]**2,
lambda a: np.sum(a**2, axis=1),
lambda a: np.sum(np.square(a), axis=1),
],
labels=["a[:, 0]**2 + a[:, 1]**2 + a[:, 2]**2",
"np.sum(a**2, axis=1)",
"np.sum(np.square(a), axis=1)"],
n_range=[2 ** k for k in range(25)],
xlabel="len(a)",
)
Shout out to https://github.com/nschloe/perfplot
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With