Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Non-equi join using data.table: column missing from the output

I am doing a left non-equi join using data.table:

OUTPUT <- DT2[DT1, on=.(DOB, FORENAME, SURNAME, POSTCODE, START_DATE <= MONTH, EXPIRY_DATE >= MONTH)]

The OUTPUT contains a correct left join, with the exception that the MONTH column (which is present in DT1) is missing.

Is this a bug in data.table?

NB: Of course, START_DATE, EXPIRY_DATE and MONTH are in the same YYYY-MM-DD, IDate format. The results of the join are correct based on these non-equi criteria. It is just that the column is missing and I need to use it in further work.

Edit 1: Simplified reproducible example

DT1 <- structure(list(ID = c(1, 2, 3), FORENAME = c("JOHN", "JACK", 
"ROB"), SURNAME = c("JOHNSON", "JACKSON", "ROBINSON"), MONTH = structure(c(16953L, 
16953L, 16953L), class = c("IDate", "Date"))), .Names = c("ID", 
"FORENAME", "SURNAME", "MONTH"), row.names = c(NA, -3L), class = c("data.table", 
"data.frame"))

DT2 <- structure(list(CERT_NUMBER = 999, FORENAME = "JOHN", SURNAME = "JOHNSON", 
    START_DATE = structure(16801L, class = c("IDate", "Date")), 
    EXPIRY_DATE = structure(17166L, class = c("IDate", "Date"
    ))), .Names = c("CERT_NUMBER", "FORENAME", "SURNAME", "START_DATE", 
"EXPIRY_DATE"), row.names = c(NA, -1L), class = c("data.table", 
"data.frame"))

OUTPUT <- DT2[DT1, on=.(FORENAME, SURNAME, START_DATE <= MONTH, EXPIRY_DATE >= MONTH)]

> OUTPUT
   CERT_NUMBER FORENAME  SURNAME START_DATE EXPIRY_DATE ID
1:         999     JOHN  JOHNSON 2016-06-01  2016-06-01  1
2:          NA     JACK  JACKSON 2016-06-01  2016-06-01  2
3:          NA      ROB ROBINSON 2016-06-01  2016-06-01  3
  • FORENAME and SURNAME are joined on and are present in the output.
  • MONTH is also (non-equi) joined on, and is absent from the output.

Why is this expected behaviour?

Even if it is expected behaviour, it is not helpful in my case, because I need to retain MONTH for further data manipulation.

My expected output would be the same table, but with the MONTH column retained as it is in DT1. After all, what I expect from a left join is for every row and column to be retained from the left table (DT1) and for all columns and only matched rows to be added from the right table (DT2).

   CERT_NUMBER FORENAME  SURNAME START_DATE EXPIRY_DATE ID      MONTH
1:         999     JOHN  JOHNSON 2016-01-01  2016-12-31  1 2016-06-01
2:          NA     JACK  JACKSON       <NA>        <NA>  2 2016-06-01
3:          NA      ROB ROBINSON       <NA>        <NA>  3 2016-06-01

Edit 2: apparently in the output produced by my code, the START and END dates are also wrong! Only person 1 had a certificate with a start date on 1-Jan and end date on 31-Dec! The expected output is what it should be. But the actual output made everything 1-Jan.

like image 331
Mihail Avatar asked May 31 '17 10:05

Mihail


People also ask

What is non equi join in database?

Non-Equi Join is also a type of INNER Join in which we need to retrieve data from multiple tables. Non-Equi Join matches the column values from different tables based on an inequality based on the operators like <,>,<=,>=,!= , BETWEEN, etc.

What is true about joining tables through an non Equijoin?

Non-equi joins are joins whose join conditions use conditional operators other than equals. An example would be where we are matching first name and then last name, but we are checking where one field from a table does not equal field from another table.

How are non Equi join implemented?

NON EQUI JOIN performs a JOIN using comparison operator other than equal(=) sign like >, <, >=, <= with conditions.


1 Answers

In data.table, joins of the form x[i] traditionally uses values from i but uses column names from x. Even though this is different from SQL which returns both, this default makes a lot of sense for equi joins since we are interested in all rows from i and if they match then both data.tables have equal values anyway, and if they don't we need to keep those unmatched values from i in result.

But for non-equi joins, since the values might not match exactly, i.e., can fall within a range, there might be cases where we will have to return outputs similar to SQL (or identify such cases and return the result user expects, similar to the case of equi joins). This hasn't been done yet, but I've placed a provision for it at the moment, which is to refer to the columns explicitly with a x. prefix. It is not convenient, I agree. Hopefully this'll be taken care of automatically soon.

Here's how to get your result using x. prefix.

ans <- DT2[DT1, .(CERT_NUMBER, FORENAME, SURNAME, x.START_DATE, x.EXPIRY_DATE, ID, MONTH), 
         on=.(FORENAME, SURNAME, START_DATE <= MONTH, EXPIRY_DATE >= MONTH)]

IIRC there's an issue filed on the GitHub project page about this as well.

like image 74
Arun Avatar answered Nov 10 '22 08:11

Arun