Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

No AppDomains in .NET Core! Why?

Is there a strong reason why Microsoft chose not to support AppDomains in .NET Core?

AppDomains are particularly useful when building long running server apps, where we may want to update the assemblies loaded by the server is a graceful manner, without shutting down the server.

Without AppDomains, how are we going to replace our assemblies in a long running server process?

AppDomains also provide us a way to isolate different parts of server code. Like, a custom websocket server can have socket code in primary appdomain, while our services run in secondary appdomain.

Without AppDomains, the above scenario is not possible.

I can see an argument that may talk about using VMs concept of Cloud for handling assembly changes and not having to incur the overhead of AppDomains. But is this what Microsoft thinks or says? or they have a specific reason and alternatives for the above scenarios?

like image 428
Aditya Pasumarthi Avatar asked Dec 03 '14 08:12

Aditya Pasumarthi


People also ask

What is not supported in .NET Core?

NET 5+ (including . NET Core) does not support saving assemblies that are generated by the System.

Which technology is discontinued in .NET Core?

NET Core no longer contains APIs such as GetMembers(), but continues to expose APIs such as Name.

What is AppDomain in .NET Core?

The AppDomain class implements a set of events that enable applications to respond when an assembly is loaded, when an application domain will be unloaded, or when an unhandled exception is thrown. For more information on using application domains, see Application Domains.

Which one is not a part of .NET Core?

ASP.NET Web Forms is not a part of the new ASP.NET Core.


2 Answers

Update for .NET Standard 2 and .NET Core 2

In .NET Standard 2 the AppDomain class is in there. However, many parts of that API will throw a PlatformNotSupportedException for .NET Core.

The main reason it's still in there is for basic stuff like registering an unhandled exception handler which will work.

The .NET Standard FAQ has this explanation:

Is AppDomain part of .NET Standard?

The AppDomain type is part of .NET Standard. Not all platforms will support the creation of new app domains, for example, .NET Core will not, so the method AppDomain.CreateDomain while being available in .NET Standard might throw PlatformNotSupportedException.

The primary reason we expose this type in .NET Standard is because the usage is fairly high and typically not associated with creating new app domains but for interacting with the current app domain, such as registering an unhandled exception handler or asking for the application's base directory.

Apart from that, the top answer and other answers also nicely explain why the bulk of AppDomain was still cut (e.g. throws a not supported exception).

like image 79
Jeroen Avatar answered Oct 19 '22 23:10

Jeroen


The point of the .NETCore subset was to keep a .NET install small. And easy to port. Which is why you can, say, run a Silverlight app on both Windows and OSX and not wait very long when you visit the web page. Downloading and installing the complete runtime and framework takes a handful of seconds, give or take.

Keeping it small inevitably requires features to be cut. Remoting was very high on that list, it is quite expensive. Otherwise well hidden, but you can for example see that delegates no longer have a functional BeginInvoke() method. Which put AppDomain on the cut list as well, you can't run code in an app domain without remoting support. So this is entirely by design.

like image 27
Hans Passant Avatar answered Oct 20 '22 00:10

Hans Passant