This is my first EF project so bear with me please.
When updating an entity such as Department, you pull it from the context, update its values and call context.SaveChanges. However, if you update Department.Employees, EF does not find that funny.
I searched and came up with the option of setting Multipleactiveresultsets=true in the connection string but want to know if:
It can be enabled by adding the "MultipleActiveResultSets=True" keyword pair to your connection string. "True" is the only valid value for enabling MARS. The following example demonstrates how to connect to an instance of SQL Server and how to specify that MARS should be enabled.
Multiple Active Result Sets (MARS) is a feature that allows the execution of multiple batches on a single connection. In previous versions, only one batch could be executed at a time against a single connection. Executing multiple batches with MARS does not imply simultaneous execution of operations.
A batch or stored procedure which starts a manual or implicit transaction when MARS is enabled must complete the transaction before the batch exits. If it does not, SQL Server rolls back all changes made by the transaction when the batch finishes.
Enabling MARS is only necessary if you want to execute multiple queries on the same connection in parallel. This happens if you do something like this:
/* Foreach uses an iterator over the resultset of your query, but the query is not fetched
immediately, instead the iterator internally triggers fetching for single
processed record from opened data reader. Because of that the query and the reader
are active until the iteration is over. */
foreach (var department in context.Departments.Where(...))
{
/* The first query is still active on the connection but now you are executing
lazy loading of all related employees =>. You are executing a second query and,
without MARS, you will get an exception. */
var employee = department.Employees.FirstOrDefault(...);
}
How to avoid that?
context.Departments.Include(d => d.Employees)
Is this the recommended way? Does this adversely affect performance / what should I look out for?
It depends on the problem you are trying to solve. If you have multiple departments to process, accessing their employees collection will trigger a separate query for each department. That is called N+1 problem - you have N departments and one query to fetch them and for each department you will execute one additional query => N+1 queries. For a huge number of departments this will be a performance killer.
Eager loading is not a bullet proof solution either. It can affect performance as well. Sometimes you simply need to execute separate queries to fetch all necessary departments and separate queries to fetch all necessary employees. If you have lazy loading turned off it should fix your relations and fill Employees property correctly for you. Btw, I made a suggestion on Data UserVoice to support this feature out of the box.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With