I have the following code:
Func<string, string> func1 = (param) =>
{
Console.WriteLine("Func 1 executing");
return "Hello" + param;
};
Func<string, string> func2 = (param) =>
{
Console.WriteLine("Func 2 executing");
return "World" + param;
};
Func<string, string> funcSum = func1 + func2;
string funcResult = funcSum("!");
Console.WriteLine(funcResult);
The output is:
Func 1 executing
Func 2 executing
World!
Inverting the sum:
Func<string, string> funcSum = func2 + func1;
Gives the output:
Func 2 executing
Func 1 executing
Hello!
My initial test was done with a boolean return type, and the returned value was also always determined by the last function. Is it working as intended? Aren't we losing the return value of the other functions? If so, is there a use case in real world of those multicast delegate of functions?
Multicast Delegates must have a return type of void Otherwise it will throw an exception.
The multicast delegate contains a list of the assigned delegates. When the multicast delegate is called, it invokes the delegates in the list, in order. Only delegates of the same type can be combined. The - operator can be used to remove a component delegate from a multicast delegate.
delegate: It is the keyword which is used to define the delegate. return_type: It is the type of value returned by the methods which the delegate will be going to call. It can be void. A method must have the same return type as the delegate.
If you have a method that accepts two numbers and you want to add them and return the sum of the two numbers, you can use a delegate to store the return value of the method as shown in the code snippet given below.
Is it working as intended?
It's working as specified, at least. Whether that's what you intended or not is a different matter :) From section 15.4 of the C# 5 specification - emphasis mine:
Invocation of a delegate instance whose invocation list contains multiple entries proceeds by invoking each of the methods in the invocation list, synchronously, in order. Each method so called is passed the same set of arguments as was given to the delegate instance. If such a delegate invocation includes reference parameters (§10.6.1.2), each method invocation will occur with a reference to the same variable; changes to that variable by one method in the invocation list will be visible to methods further down the invocation list. If the delegate invocation includes output parameters or a return value, their final value will come from the invocation of the last delegate in the list.
Next:
Aren't we losing the return value of the other functions?
Yes, at the moment.
If so, is there a use case in real world of those multicast delegate of functions?
Very rarely, to be honest. However, you can split a multicast delegate apart, using Delegate.GetInvocationList()
:
foreach (Func<string, string> func in funcSum.GetInvocationList())
{
Console.WriteLine(func("!"));
}
The multicast delegate will always return the result of the last function. Because there is no predefined way to combine or chain the T
results.
If you want to obtain all the results along the chain, try this :
var result = "!";
foreach (Func<string, string> func in funcSum.GetInvocationList())
{
result = func(result);
}
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With