I'm sorry if my question isn't very clear. I'm not sure how to phrase it.
I'd like to use VIM to write papers for some classes I'm in. The problem I'm having is with the formatting of lines in the editor. If I don't explicitly break the end of a line with the enter key, when I try to move the cursor through the text, it skips multiple lines if I have a sentence that spans more than one line. Is there any way to make it so that the cursor will be able to move through the text akin to the way it does in most word processors?
In normal mode or in insert mode, press Alt-j to move the current line down, or press Alt-k to move the current line up. After visually selecting a block of lines (for example, by pressing V then moving the cursor down), press Alt-j to move the whole block down, or press Alt-k to move the block up.
To do this, press Esc , type the line number, and then press Shift-g . If you press Esc and then Shift-g without specifying a line number, it will take you to the last line in the file.
The problem with the often used
noremap j gj
noremap k gk
option is, that it breaks the <vcount>
functionality, if you have lines in your text, which span across multiple lines.
Example: you want 10k
(go UP 10 lines), because you use relative numbers in the sidebar, but theres a multiline with 4 lines height. Therefore you end up effectively at 6 lines (6k
) above your desired line, which you read from your relative numbers. You'd have to calculate manually! Annoying... Especially if you have multiple multiline between your current position and your desired position - not Vim-istic!
I like my <vcount>
function together with my :relativenumber
, which is why I wrote the following functions & mapping to solve all problems related to this.
These functions let you use commands like 10j
or 10k
as expected, despite the presence of multilines with all the advantages of using gj
and gk
as your default movement mappings:
Edit: I just found the following on reddit, which is so much better then my own solution. This is shortest possible version:
nnoremap <expr> j v:count ? 'j' : 'gj'
nnoremap <expr> k v:count ? 'k' : 'gk'
(If you use noremap
instead of nnoremap
, then this works in both visual and normal modes)
"Longer" version for better understanding and completeness:
nnoremap <expr> k (v:count == 0 ? 'gk' : 'k')
nnoremap <expr> j (v:count == 0 ? 'gj' : 'j')
source: http://www.reddit.com/r/vim/comments/2k4cbr/problem_with_gj_and_gk/
My old solution:
nnoremap <silent> j :<C-U>call Down(v:count)<CR>
vnoremap <silent> j gj
nnoremap <silent> k :<C-U>call Up(v:count)<CR>
vnoremap <silent> k gk
function! Down(vcount)
if a:vcount == 0
exe "normal! gj"
else
exe "normal! ". a:vcount ."j"
endif
endfunction
function! Up(vcount)
if a:vcount == 0
exe "normal! gk"
else
exe "normal! ". a:vcount ."k"
endif
endfunction
That's because the default j
and k
motions move across physical lines, not the visible, soft-wrapped screen lines (when you have :set wrap
). You can use the gj
and gk
commands for that.
If you want to default to that behavior, you can remap the default keys by putting this into your ~/.vimrc
:
noremap j gj
noremap k gk
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With