What is the motivation of having functional dependencies in Haskell ?
One example of a functional dependency:
class (Monad m) => MonadSupply s m | m -> s where
next :: m (Maybe s)
It is stated in the RWH book, that functional dependency helps the type checker. How does it actually help ?
Also, this piece of code actually compiles:
class (Monad m) => MonadSupply s m where
next :: m (Maybe s)
But I guess, it will produce an runtime error.
The benefits of functional dependency and an overall database management system can help businesses, organizations and companies to: Prevent data redundancy. Functional dependency helps ensure the same data doesn't exist repetitively across a database or network of databases. Maintain the quality and integrity of data.
A functional dependency (FD) is a relationship between two attributes, typically between the PK and other non-key attributes within a table. For any relation R, attribute Y is functionally dependent on attribute X (usually the PK), if for every valid instance of X, that value of X uniquely determines the value of Y.
A functional dependency is a constraint that specifies the relationship between two sets of attributes where one set can accurately determine the value of other sets. It is denoted as X → Y, where X is a set of attributes that is capable of determining the value of Y.
Functional dependencies and Normalization play an important role in relational database design. Functional dependencies are key to establishing the relationship between key and non-key attributes in a relation. Normalization process works towards removing anomalies in a relation and prevents data redundancy.
It's perfectly fine to write code not using functional dependencies, it's just a pain to use since the inference sucks.
Basically without FDs, the function get :: MonadState m s => m s
will have to figure out m
and s
independently. Usually m
is quite easily inferred, but often s
would require an explicit annotation.
Moreover, this is much more general than we need, so instead we can restrict our typechecker to say "For m
, there is exactly 1 s
", this way, once m
is inferred, s
is obvious to the type inference algorithm
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With