Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Modifying reference member from const member function in C++

I am working on const-correctness of my code and just wondered why this code compiles:

class X {     int x;     int& y; public:     X(int& _y):y(_y)     {     } void f(int& newY) const     {         //x = 3; would not work, that's fine         y = newY; //does compile. Why?     } };  int main(int argc, char **argv)  {     int i1=0, i2=0;     X myX(i1);     myX.f(i2); ... } 

As far as I understand, f() is changing the object myX, although it says to be const. How can I ensure my compiler complains when I do assign to y? (Visual C++ 2008)

Thank a lot!

like image 401
Philipp Avatar asked Mar 12 '10 09:03

Philipp


2 Answers

Because you are not changing any variable in X. Actually, you are changing _y which is an outsider with respect to your class. Don't forget that:

y = newY; 

Is assigning the value of newY to the variable pointed by y, but not the references them selves. Only on initialization the references are considered.

like image 108
Khaled Alshaya Avatar answered Oct 07 '22 20:10

Khaled Alshaya


The situation is similar to pointer members. In a const member function, the const applies to the pointer itself, not the pointee.

It's the difference between:

X* const //this is how the const applies: you can modify the pointee const X* 

Except X& const isn't valid syntax, since the reference can't be made to refer to another object in the first place (they are implicitly always const). In conclusion: const on methods has no effect on member references.

like image 35
visitor Avatar answered Oct 07 '22 22:10

visitor