Is the following perfectly defined by the standard ?
#include <iostream>
template <unsigned int... Values, class... Types>
void f(Types&&... values)
{
std::cout<<sizeof...(Values)<<" "<<sizeof...(Types)<<std::endl;
}
int main()
{
f<7, 5>(3);
return 0;
}
It compiles well under g++ 4.8
but I wonder if it is normal.
From ISO C++ standard's current working draft 14.1 (11):
A template parameter pack of a function template shall not be followed by another template >parameter unless that template parameter can be deduced from the parameter-type-list of >the function template or has a default argument
In your case 'Types' is a function parameter pack and 'Values', that is a template parameter pack, can be always followed by a function parameter pack. Also this code works for the same reason:
#include <iostream>
template <class... Values, class... Types>
void f(Types&&... values)
{
std::cout<<sizeof...(Values)<<" "<<sizeof...(Types)<<std::endl;
}
int main()
{
f<int, float>(-3, 5);
return 0;
}
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With