I find one of the most time-consuming compiler errors for me is "cannot instantiate abstract class," since the problem is always that I didn't intend for the class to be abstract and the compiler doesn't list which functions are abstract. There's got to be a more intelligent way to solve these than reading the headers 10 times until I finally notice a missing "const" somewhere. How do you solve these?
We cannot instantiate an abstract class in Java because it is abstract, it is not complete, hence it cannot be used.
We can't instantiate an abstract class because the motive of abstract class is to provide a common definition of base class that multiple derived classes can share.
An abstract class is, conceptually, a class that cannot be instantiated and is usually implemented as a class that has one or more pure virtual (abstract) functions. A pure virtual function is one which must be overridden by any concrete (i.e., non-abstract) derived class.
Classes defined as abstract cannot be instantiated, and any class that contains at least one abstract method must also be abstract.
cannot instantiate abstract class
Based on this error, my guess is that you are using Visual Studio (since that's what Visual C++ says when you try to instantiate an abstract class).
Look at the Visual Studio Output window (View => Output); the output should include a statement after the error stating:
stubby.cpp(10) : error C2259: 'bar' : cannot instantiate abstract class
due to following members:
'void foo::x(void) const' : is abstract
stubby.cpp(2) : see declaration of 'foo::x'
(That is the error given for bdonlan's example code)
In Visual Studio, the "Error List" window only displays the first line of an error message.
C++ tells you exactly which functions are abstract, and where they are declared:
class foo {
virtual void x() const = 0;
};
class bar : public foo {
virtual void x() { }
};
void test() {
new bar;
}
test.cpp: In function ‘void test()’:
test.cpp:10: error: cannot allocate an object of abstract type ‘bar’
test.cpp:5: note: because the following virtual functions are pure within ‘bar’:
test.cpp:2: note: virtual void foo::x() const
So perhaps try compiling your code with C++, or specify your compiler so others can give useful suggestions for your specific compiler.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With