Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Memcached, Redis, or Couchbase [closed]

I have a Debian server with about 16GB RAM that I'm using with nginx and several heavy mysql databases, and some custom php apps. I'd like to implement a memory cache between Mysql and PHP, but the databases are too large to store everything in RAM. I'm thinking a LRU cache may be better so far as I research. Does this rule out Redis? Couchbase is also a consideration.

like image 972
Poe Avatar asked Feb 09 '12 15:02

Poe


People also ask

Which is better Memcached or Redis?

Redis uses a single core and shows better performance than Memcached in storing small datasets when measured in terms of cores. Memcached implements a multi-threaded architecture by utilizing multiple cores. Therefore, for storing larger datasets, Memcached can perform better than Redis.

Does couchbase use Memcached?

Yes memcached is used internally by Couchbase server. This is the cache of the "database" but also and more importantly the network protocol used between the clients (applications) and the database/cache.

Is Memcached still used?

Just a note: as it was confirmed by the current maintainer on Twitter, Memcached is still actively developed / maintained.

Is Memcached same as Redis?

Although they are both easy to use and offer high performance, there are important differences to consider when choosing an engine. Memcached is designed for simplicity while Redis offers a rich set of features that make it effective for a wide range of use cases.


2 Answers

Supposing there is a unique server running nginx + php + mysql instances with some remaining free RAM, the easiest way to use that RAM to cache data is simply to increase the buffer caches of the mysql instances. Databases already use LRU-like mechanisms to handle their buffers.

Now, if you need to move part of the processing away from the databases, then pre-caching may be an option. Before talking about memcached/redis, a shared memory cache integrated with php such as APC will be efficient provided only one server is considered (actually more efficient than redis/memcached).

Both memcached and redis can be considered to perform remote caching (i.e. to share the cache between various nodes). I would not rule out redis for this: it can easily be configured for this purpose. Both will allow to define a memory limit, and handle the cache with LRU-like behavior.

However, I would not use couchbase here, which is an elastic (i.e. supposed to be used on several nodes) NoSQL key/value store (i.e. not a cache). You could probably move some data from your mysql instances to a couchbase cluster, but using it just for caching is over-engineering IMO.

like image 99
Didier Spezia Avatar answered Oct 13 '22 08:10

Didier Spezia


As Matt Ingenthron pointed out and Hari noted that Couchbase supports working as a direct Memcached replacement. Couchbase utilizes memcached in a non-elastic way, as in each node participating in the memcache cluster is discreet with no persistence, i.e. just a cache but couchbase also offers "Couchbase" bucket types which do provide persistence. Membase is part of the code as well so Couchbase not only serve data from disk but also from RAM and persists it there while replicating to other nodes and persisting to disk as changes are applied. I would highly recommend Couchbase 3.x for both caching and persistence in one footprint, or multiple footprints if you just wanted only a caching layer separate from your persistence layer.

like image 31
Austin Gonyou Avatar answered Oct 13 '22 07:10

Austin Gonyou