Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

MEF vs Mono.AddIn

I'm developing a .NET 3.5 C# desktop application. It should be extensible via plug-ins.

Are there any articles etc. discussing the differences between MEF and Mono.AddIn to help me make an informed decision?

Or even better have you got experience with both of these frameworks and can comment on them?

Thanks, Patrick

like image 611
Patrick Wolf Avatar asked Oct 20 '09 06:10

Patrick Wolf


3 Answers

[NOTE: I work on MonoDevelop, which uses Mono.Addins, but I discussed the differences between MEF and Mono.Addins extensively with Glenn Block from the MEF team last week]

MEF is based on composing code, though the underlying abstractions are very flexible. In contrast, Mono.Addins is based on a tree of metadata, where you can plug data/metadata/code into a rich schema of your definition, so extensions can add data/metadata as well as code.

Mono.Addins gives you an addin management/packaging/repository/update system out-of-the box. For MEF, at this point, you would have to build your own.

MEF has a slightly lower barrier to entry, and a lot more design work has gone into its usability and underlying abstractions. In addition, it's part of .NET 4, so it'll have a much bigger community of users developing with/for it.

At this point, if you need to plug in data/metadata as well as code and you want a ready-made packaging system, I'd recommend Mono.Addins, otherwise I'd recommend MEF. Going forwards, it's likely that Mono.Addins' features will be implemented on MEF, so there will probably be a migration path towards MEF.

like image 192
Mikayla Hutchinson Avatar answered Oct 20 '22 04:10

Mikayla Hutchinson


I believe Hanselminutes Show #181 has some discussion about Mono.AddIns and what it brings to the table.

While scouring the web I also found this discussion which highlights a difference in how these two frameworks currently handle catalog caching.

like image 24
Peter Lillevold Avatar answered Oct 20 '22 06:10

Peter Lillevold


I investigated both and decided to go with MEF, mostly because it's going to be released as part of .NET 4 so there will automatically be more support, discussion, and development surrounding it. Also, MEF seemed to be able to do everything I needed using attributes right in the code, and Mono.AddIns required some metadata files, if I remember correctly.

EDIT: If you'd like to see the result of my efforts at using MEF to build an extensible application framework, I've open sourced it, and given it a name: SoapBox Core.

like image 1
Scott Whitlock Avatar answered Oct 20 '22 05:10

Scott Whitlock