Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Manually raising (throwing) an exception in Python

How can I raise an exception in Python so that it can later be caught via an except block?

like image 617
TIMEX Avatar asked Jan 12 '10 21:01

TIMEX


People also ask

How do I manually raise an exception in Python?

How do I manually throw/raise an exception in Python? Use the most specific Exception constructor that semantically fits your issue. Be specific in your message, e.g.: raise ValueError('A very specific bad thing happened.

What is an raising exception in Python with example?

When handling an exception, you may want to raise another exception. For example: def division(a, b): try: return a / b except ZeroDivisionError as ex: raise ValueError('b must not zero') Code language: Python (python) In the division() function, we raise a ValueError exception if the ZeroDivisionError occurs.

How do you raise error type in Python?

TypeError is raised whenever an operation is performed on an incorrect/unsupported object type. For example, using the + (addition) operator on a string and an integer value will raise TypeError.

What does the raise command do in Python?

Python raise Keyword is used to raise exceptions or errors. The raise keyword raises an error and stops the control flow of the program. It is used to bring up the current exception in an exception handler so that it can be handled further up the call stack.


2 Answers

How do I manually throw/raise an exception in Python?

Use the most specific Exception constructor that semantically fits your issue.

Be specific in your message, e.g.:

raise ValueError('A very specific bad thing happened.') 

Don't raise generic exceptions

Avoid raising a generic Exception. To catch it, you'll have to catch all other more specific exceptions that subclass it.

Problem 1: Hiding bugs

raise Exception('I know Python!') # Don't! If you catch, likely to hide bugs. 

For example:

def demo_bad_catch():     try:         raise ValueError('Represents a hidden bug, do not catch this')         raise Exception('This is the exception you expect to handle')     except Exception as error:         print('Caught this error: ' + repr(error))  >>> demo_bad_catch() Caught this error: ValueError('Represents a hidden bug, do not catch this',) 

Problem 2: Won't catch

And more specific catches won't catch the general exception:

def demo_no_catch():     try:         raise Exception('general exceptions not caught by specific handling')     except ValueError as e:         print('we will not catch exception: Exception')    >>> demo_no_catch() Traceback (most recent call last):   File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>   File "<stdin>", line 3, in demo_no_catch Exception: general exceptions not caught by specific handling 

Best Practices: raise statement

Instead, use the most specific Exception constructor that semantically fits your issue.

raise ValueError('A very specific bad thing happened') 

which also handily allows an arbitrary number of arguments to be passed to the constructor:

raise ValueError('A very specific bad thing happened', 'foo', 'bar', 'baz')  

These arguments are accessed by the args attribute on the Exception object. For example:

try:     some_code_that_may_raise_our_value_error() except ValueError as err:     print(err.args) 

prints

('message', 'foo', 'bar', 'baz')     

In Python 2.5, an actual message attribute was added to BaseException in favor of encouraging users to subclass Exceptions and stop using args, but the introduction of message and the original deprecation of args has been retracted.

Best Practices: except clause

When inside an except clause, you might want to, for example, log that a specific type of error happened, and then re-raise. The best way to do this while preserving the stack trace is to use a bare raise statement. For example:

logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)  try:     do_something_in_app_that_breaks_easily() except AppError as error:     logger.error(error)     raise                 # just this!     # raise AppError      # Don't do this, you'll lose the stack trace! 

Don't modify your errors... but if you insist.

You can preserve the stacktrace (and error value) with sys.exc_info(), but this is way more error prone and has compatibility problems between Python 2 and 3, prefer to use a bare raise to re-raise.

To explain - the sys.exc_info() returns the type, value, and traceback.

type, value, traceback = sys.exc_info() 

This is the syntax in Python 2 - note this is not compatible with Python 3:

raise AppError, error, sys.exc_info()[2] # avoid this. # Equivalently, as error *is* the second object: raise sys.exc_info()[0], sys.exc_info()[1], sys.exc_info()[2] 

If you want to, you can modify what happens with your new raise - e.g. setting new args for the instance:

def error():     raise ValueError('oops!')  def catch_error_modify_message():     try:         error()     except ValueError:         error_type, error_instance, traceback = sys.exc_info()         error_instance.args = (error_instance.args[0] + ' <modification>',)         raise error_type, error_instance, traceback 

And we have preserved the whole traceback while modifying the args. Note that this is not a best practice and it is invalid syntax in Python 3 (making keeping compatibility much harder to work around).

>>> catch_error_modify_message() Traceback (most recent call last):   File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>   File "<stdin>", line 3, in catch_error_modify_message   File "<stdin>", line 2, in error ValueError: oops! <modification> 

In Python 3:

raise error.with_traceback(sys.exc_info()[2]) 

Again: avoid manually manipulating tracebacks. It's less efficient and more error prone. And if you're using threading and sys.exc_info you may even get the wrong traceback (especially if you're using exception handling for control flow - which I'd personally tend to avoid.)

Python 3, Exception chaining

In Python 3, you can chain Exceptions, which preserve tracebacks:

raise RuntimeError('specific message') from error 

Be aware:

  • this does allow changing the error type raised, and
  • this is not compatible with Python 2.

Deprecated Methods:

These can easily hide and even get into production code. You want to raise an exception, and doing them will raise an exception, but not the one intended!

Valid in Python 2, but not in Python 3 is the following:

raise ValueError, 'message' # Don't do this, it's deprecated! 

Only valid in much older versions of Python (2.4 and lower), you may still see people raising strings:

raise 'message' # really really wrong. don't do this. 

In all modern versions, this will actually raise a TypeError, because you're not raising a BaseException type. If you're not checking for the right exception and don't have a reviewer that's aware of the issue, it could get into production.

Example Usage

I raise Exceptions to warn consumers of my API if they're using it incorrectly:

def api_func(foo):     '''foo should be either 'baz' or 'bar'. returns something very useful.'''     if foo not in _ALLOWED_ARGS:         raise ValueError('{foo} wrong, use "baz" or "bar"'.format(foo=repr(foo))) 

Create your own error types when apropos

"I want to make an error on purpose, so that it would go into the except"

You can create your own error types, if you want to indicate something specific is wrong with your application, just subclass the appropriate point in the exception hierarchy:

class MyAppLookupError(LookupError):     '''raise this when there's a lookup error for my app''' 

and usage:

if important_key not in resource_dict and not ok_to_be_missing:     raise MyAppLookupError('resource is missing, and that is not ok.') 
like image 54
Russia Must Remove Putin Avatar answered Sep 24 '22 04:09

Russia Must Remove Putin


DON'T DO THIS. Raising a bare Exception is absolutely not the right thing to do; see Aaron Hall's excellent answer instead.

Can't get much more pythonic than this:

raise Exception("I know python!") 

Replace Exception with the specific type of exception you want to throw.

See the raise statement docs for python if you'd like more info.

like image 28
Gabriel Hurley Avatar answered Sep 23 '22 04:09

Gabriel Hurley