Menu
Here is a simple multiprocessing code:
from multiprocessing import Process, Manager manager = Manager() d = manager.dict() def f(): d[1].append(4) print d if __name__ == '__main__': d[1] = [] p = Process(target=f) p.start() p.join() Output I get is:
{1: []} Why don't I get {1: [4]} as the output?
693
A managers. dict() allow to share a dictionary across process and perform thread-safe operation.
The Pool class in multiprocessing can handle an enormous number of processes. It allows you to run multiple jobs per process (due to its ability to queue the jobs). The memory is allocated only to the executing processes, unlike the Process class, which allocates memory to all the processes.
Python multiprocessing join The join method blocks the execution of the main process until the process whose join method is called terminates. Without the join method, the main process won't wait until the process gets terminated.
multiprocessing. freeze_support() This function will allow a frozen program to create and start new processes via the multiprocessing. Process class when the program is frozen for distribution on Windows.
This does not work as expected at least on python 3.7.2 using osx 10.14.4 Dict is not synchronized and its contents are rewritten by other processes. However, <code>multiprocessing.Manager ().list ()</code> works as expected. A general answer involves using a Manager object. Adapted from the docs:
@MikePatel Nope, it doesn't work. I tried something similar, and it failed. The managerized dict is a proxy/channel among processes. That's why it has to be a mutable container. You can put in data in this proxy container, but things would go awry if you want to assign itself in the new/child process with another dict.
Thanks senderle. Indeed, D = multiprocessing.Manager ().dict () solves my problem. I was using D = dict (). @LorenzoBelli, if you're asking whether access to the manager is synchronized, I believe the answer is yes. multiprocessing.Manager () returns an instance of SyncManager, the name of which suggests as much!
multiprocessing_dict = multiprocessing.Manager ().dict () This will set multiprocessing_dict_ as an empty DictProxy object in your script. You will see how store results to this later in the article.
Here is what you wrote:
# from here code executes in main process and all child processes # every process makes all these imports from multiprocessing import Process, Manager # every process creates own 'manager' and 'd' manager = Manager() # BTW, Manager is also child process, and # in its initialization it creates new Manager, and new Manager # creates new and new and new # Did you checked how many python processes were in your system? - a lot! d = manager.dict() def f(): # 'd' - is that 'd', that is defined in globals in this, current process d[1].append(4) print d if __name__ == '__main__': # from here code executes ONLY in main process d[1] = [] p = Process(target=f) p.start() p.join() Here is what you should have written:
from multiprocessing import Process, Manager def f(d): d[1] = d[1] + [4] print d if __name__ == '__main__': manager = Manager() # create only 1 mgr d = manager.dict() # create only 1 dict d[1] = [] p = Process(target=f,args=(d,)) # say to 'f', in which 'd' it should append p.start() p.join() If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With
