I'm doing a program that calculates the probability of lotteries. Specification is choose 5 numbers out of 47 and 1 out of 27
So I did the following:
#include <iostream>
long int choose(unsigned n, unsigned k);
long int factorial(unsigned n);
int main(){
using namespace std;
long int regularProb, megaProb;
regularProb = choose(47, 5);
megaProb = choose(27, 1);
cout << "The probability of the correct number is 1 out of " << (regularProb * megaProb) << endl;
return 0;
}
long int choose(unsigned n, unsigned k){
return factorial(n) / (factorial(k) * factorial(n-k));
}
long int factorial(unsigned n){
long int result = 1;
for (int i=2;i<=n;i++) result *= i;
return result;
}
However the program doesn't work. The program calculates for 30 seconds, then gives me Process 4 exited with code -1,073,741,676
I have to change all the long int to long double, but that loses precision. Is it because long int is too short for the big values? Though I thought long int nowadays are 64bit? My compiler is g++ win32 (64bit host).
The main difference between long and double in Java is that long is a data type that stores 64 bit two's complement integer while double is a data type that stores double prevision 64 bit IEEE 754 floating point. In brief, long is an integral type whereas double is a floating point type.
But before starting the blog post, I want to make you clear that long and long int are identical and also long long and long long int. In both cases, the int is optional. There are several shorthands for built-in types. Let's see some examples of signed built-in types.
long is a signed 64-bit integer value and double is a 64-bit floating point value.
Long (long integer) variables are stored as signed 32-bit (4-byte) numbers ranging in value from -2,147,483,648 to 2,147,483,647. The type-declaration character for Long is the ampersand (&).
Whether long
is 64-bit or not depends on the model. Windows uses a 32-bit long
. Use int64_t
from <stdint.h>
if you need to ensure it is 64-bit.
But even if long
is 64-bit it is still too small to hold factorial(47)
.
47! == 2.58623242e+59
2^64 == 1.84467441e+19
although 47C5 is way smaller than that.
You should never use nCr == n!/(r! (n-r)!) directly do the calculation as it overflows easily. Instead, factor out the n!/(n-r)! to get:
47 * 46 * 45 * 44 * 43
C = ----------------------
47 5 5 * 4 * 3 * 2 * 1
this can be managed even by a 32-bit integer.
BTW, for @Coffee's question: a double
only has 53-bits of precision, where 47! requires 154 bits. 47! and 42! represented in double
would be
47! = (0b10100100110011011110001010000100011110111001100100100 << 145) ± (1 << 144)
42! = (0b11110000010101100000011101010010010001101100101001000 << 117) ± (1 << 116)
so 47! / (42! × 5!)'s possible range of value will be
0b101110110011111110011 = 1533939 53 bits
v
max = 0b101110110011111110011.000000000000000000000000000000001001111...
val = 0b101110110011111110010.111111111111111111111111111111111010100...
min = 0b101110110011111110010.111111111111111111111111111111101011010...
that's enough to get the exact value 47C5.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With