The range in a for
-loop, as I understand, is lower-limit inclusive and upper-limit exclusive. This is introducing an issue in the following code:
fn main() {
let a: u8 = 4;
for num in 0..256 {
if num == a {
println!("match found");
break;
}
}
}
I want to loop 256 times from 0 to 255, and this fits into the range of data supported by u8
. But since the range is upper limit exclusive, I have to give 256 as the limit to process 255. Due to this, the compiler gives the following warning.
warning: literal out of range for u8
--> src/main.rs:4:19
|
4 | for num in 0..256 {
| ^^^
|
= note: #[warn(overflowing_literals)] on by default
When I execute this, the program skips the for
loop.
In my opinion, the compiler has to ignore 256 in the range and accept the range as u8
range. Is it correct? Is there any other way to give the range?
You can combine iterators to create full u8
range:
use std::iter::once;
for i in (0..255).chain(once(255)){
//...
}
In nightly Rust you can use inclusive range:
#![feature(inclusive_range_syntax)]
for i in 0...255 {
//...
}
As alex already said, it's probably the best to iterate using bigger integer types (like u32
) and cast it when comparing to the u8
you're searching for:
let a: u8 = 4;
for num in 0..256 {
if (num as u8) == a {
println!("match found");
break;
}
}
In this special case you can use a half-open range, too:
let a: u8 = 4;
for num in 0.. {
if num == a {
println!("match found");
break;
}
}
Also when I execute this, the program skips the for loop.
The binary representation of 256 is 1_0000_0000
. u8
only saves the 8 rightmost bits, so just 0
s. Thus 0..256u8
is equivalent to 0..0
, which of course is an empty range.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With