Everyone use lot of List. I need to iterate over this list, so I use the known SyncRoot pattern.
Recently I noticed in this post that the SyncRoot should be avoided in favor of "embedded" thread-safety (each method will lock on an private object without exposing it using SyncRoot property). I can understand it, and partially I agree on that.
The question is that List<T> class doesn't implements the SyncRoot property, even if implements the ICollection interface, which expose the SyncRoot property. I say this bause the code
List<int> list = new List<int>()
list.SyncRoot;
give me the following compiler error:
error CS0117: 'System.Collections.Generic.List' does not contain a definition for 'SyncRoot'
...If this is true, how could I synchronize a public property of type List<T> when iterating over it?
It is actually implemented explicitly.
object ICollection.SyncRoot
{
get
{
if (this._syncRoot == null)
{
Interlocked.CompareExchange(ref this._syncRoot, new object(), null);
}
return this._syncRoot;
}
}
This means you must cast to ICollection
to use it.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With