I'm writing a database test against a repository that uses L2S. In my database I have a Manifest
entity and an AllocatedTransaction
entity. The AllocatedTransaction entity has a foreign key to the Manifest's id. The DDL looks something like this:
Manifest:
Id - int - identity
AllocateTransaction:
Id - int - identity
Quantity - int
ManifestId - FK to Manifest
In my test, I'm checking to see if AllocatedTransactions are coming back with the Manifest. The test looks like this:
[TestMethod]
public void FindByIdTest()
{
using (data.EZTracDataContext dataContext = new data.EZTracDataContext())
{
using (new TransactionScope())
{
data.Manifest manifest = _testDataProvider.AddManifest(dataContext);
data.AllocatedTransaction allocatedTransaction = _testDataProvider.AddEligibilityAllocated(dataContext, 5, manifest.Id);
ManifestRepository repository = CreateRepository(dataContext);
var actual = repository.FindById(manifest.Id).AllocatedTransactions;
var expected = new[] { new domain.AllocatedTransaction(allocatedTransaction.Id, 5, manifest.Id) }.ToList();
CollectionAssertAreEqual(actual, expected);
}
}
}
The _testDataProvider
just adds records to the database using the passed in dataContext
. The FindById
method looks like this:
public domain.Manifest FindById(int id)
{
var persistedManifest = GetPersistedManifest(id);
var requestedManifest = GetDomainManifestFromData(persistedManifest);
return requestedManifest;
}
private Manifest GetPersistedManifest(int manifestId)
{
return (from manifests in DataContext.Manifests
where manifests.Id == manifestId
select manifests).FirstOrDefault();
}
My problem is the Manifest entity coming back from the DataContext does not have the AllocateTransaction associated to it. The strange thing is pre-existing Manifests do come back with their AllocatedTransactions attached. Could using the same DataContext object for inserting the records and retrieving the records be causing this? Is this a bug with L2S?
If I'm understanding your question, is this what you're trying to do?
using (new TransactionScope())
{
Manifest manifest = new Manifest
{
AllocatedTransactions.Add(new AllocatedTransaction
{
Quantity = 5
}
};
DataContext.Manifests.InsertOnSubmit(manifest);
DataContext.SubmitChanges();
Manifest newManifest = DataContext.Manifests.Where(a => a.ID == manifest.ID).SingleOrDefault();
Assert.AreEqual(manifest.AllocatedTransactions.First().Quantity, newManifest.AllocatedTransactions.First().Quantity);
}
You also don't need to manually retrieve the AllocatedTransaction entities associated with the Manifest. Just retrieve the Manifest
entity as I did with the newManifest
object and all the associated AllocatedTransaction
entities should follow along.
UPDATE:
It looks like you're trying to attach in the wrong direction. You need to attach the AllocatedTransaction to the Manifest, not the other way around:
Manifest manifest = DataContext.Manifests.Single(a => a.ID == 27);
AllocatedTransaction allTrans = DataContext.AllocatedTransactions.Single(a => a.ID == 53);
manifest.AllocatedTransactions.Add(allTrans);
DataContext.SubmitChanges();
This assumes that both the Manifest and AllocatedTransaction records already exist. I would highly recommend that you **not* prepopulate the ManifestID
field in the AllocatedTransactions object. If you add it as I have demonstrated above, the LINQ engine will automatically resolve and update the foreign key value. If you set the value ahead of time, it may throw off the ChangeSet and assume that you are trying to add a new record rather than attach an existing one.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With