I can't find any ressources explaining what exactly the difference between BeforeEachCallback
and BeforeTestExecutionCallback
in the JUnit Jupiter extension model is. (I am of course also interested in the "After"-variants)
To my understanding, the following timeline describes what is happening:
BeforeEach
- BeforeTestExecution
- Actual execution of the test
- AfterTestExecution
- AfterEach
I suppose that BeforeTestExecution
exists so you can execute code after all the BeforeEach
callbacks have been worked on but before the actual test execution. However this is still unclear to me, because everyone could just use BeforeTestExecution
instead of BeforeEach
and the order of execution of these callbacks is random again.
So what is BeforeTestExecution
exactly for and what happens if you use this callback in multiple extensions at the same time?
Differences Between JUnit 4 and JUnit 5 Some other differences include: The minimum JDK for JUnit 4 was JDK 5, while JUnit 5 requires at least JDK 8. The @Before , @BeforeClass , @After , and @AfterClass annotations are now the more readable as the @BeforeEach , @BeforeAll , @AfterEach , and @AfterAll annotations.
@ExtendWith is a repeatable annotation that is used to register extensions for the annotated test class, test interface, test method, parameter, or field. Annotated parameters are supported in test class constructors, in test methods, and in @BeforeAll , @AfterAll , @BeforeEach , and @AfterEach lifecycle methods.
JUnit 5 extensions are related to a certain event in the execution of a test, referred to as an extension point. When a certain life cycle phase is reached, the JUnit engine calls registered extensions. Five main types of extension points can be used: test instance post-processing.
The Javadocs (here and here) don't make a clear distinction between them but the JUnit5 docs include the following:
BeforeTestExecutionCallback
andAfterTestExecutionCallback
define the APIs for Extensions that wish to add behavior that will be executed immediately before and immediately after a test method is executed, respectively. As such, these callbacks are well suited for timing, tracing, and similar use cases. If you need to implement callbacks that are invoked around@BeforeEach
and@AfterEach
methods, implementBeforeEachCallback
andAfterEachCallback
instead.
So, if you want to wrap just the test execution without any of the setup then use BeforeTestExecutionCallback
. The docs go on to suggest timing and logging test execution as possible use cases for BeforeTestExecutionCallback
.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With