I have an h:commandLink
that calls a method that changes a property bound to a radio input.
I also have a text input on the same form with some validation (required=true).
If I leave the text input blank, and click on h:commandLink
with execute="@this
, the radio button updates from the model property as expected, because the text input is never processed and validation never fires.
However, if first I click on a different h:commandLink
with execute="@form"
, then the link with execute="@this"
, the validation messages go away but the radio button value does not update from the model even though the UIInput for the radio button was never in an invalid state.
I'm finding it annoying that the execute="@this"
behaves differently depending on what I had done previously, when my intent with @this
was to force everything to update from the model and ignore any submitted values from the components.
I suspect what's happening is something like this:
@form
, radio button and text are both processed. localValue
is setlocalValue
remains set and does not get cleared or propagate to value
resetValue()
or to re-process the component in question (e.g., execute="@this radio"
) to clear out localValue
and then allow refreshing from bean.My questions are:
It feels like this may just be another example of this question
How can I populate a text field using PrimeFaces AJAX after validation errors occur?
Unfortunately I feel like I'm finding lots of those lately. :-(
Code example below:
<h:form>
<h:messages/>
Radio =
<h:selectOneRadio value="#{testBean.radioValue}" id="radio" binding="#{radio}">
<f:selectItem itemValue="foo" itemLabel="Foo"/>
<f:selectItem itemValue="bar" itemLabel="Bar"/>
</h:selectOneRadio>
<br></br>
radio bean value = <h:outputText value="#{testBean.radioValue}"/>
<br></br>
radio UIInput localValue = <h:outputText value="#{radio.localValue}"/>
<br></br>
radio UIInput value = <h:outputText value="#{radio.value}"/>
<br></br>
String w/validation = <h:inputText value="#{testBean.stringValue}" required="true" />
<br></br>
<ul>
<li>
<h:commandLink actionListener="#{testBean.changeRadioValue}" value="execute = @form">
<f:ajax render="@form" execute="@form"/>
</h:commandLink>
</li>
<li>
<h:commandLink actionListener="#{testBean.changeRadioValue}" value="execute = @this">
<f:ajax render="@form" execute="@this"/>
</h:commandLink>
</li>
<li>
<h:commandLink actionListener="#{testBean.changeRadioValue}" value="execute = @this radio">
<f:ajax render="@form" execute="@this radio"/>
</h:commandLink>
</li>
</ul>
</h:form>
And this bean:
@ManagedBean
@ViewScoped
public class TestBean {
private String radioValue = "foo";
private String stringValue;
public void changeRadioValue() {
radioValue = "bar";
}
// + getters/setters
}
is my understanding of the lifecycle correct?
Yes.
Am I doing something wrong, or is this one of the annoying-by design things about JSF?
It's one of the "annoying by-design things" of JSF. As stated in my answer on that related question:
Coming back to the concrete problem, I'd imagine that this is an oversight in the JSF2 specification. It would make much more sense to us, JSF developers, when the JSF specification mandates the following:
- When JSF needs to update/re-render an input component by an ajax request, and that input component is not included in the process/execute of the ajax request, then JSF should reset the input component's value.
I only don't remember anymore if I have ever reported this against JSF spec. Edit: I reported it: JSF spec issue 1060.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With