I extended the jQuery object to return it's inner HTML...
$.fn.toString = function() {
return this.html();
};
console.log("The inner HTML is: " + $("<div>Here, <i>there</i>, everywhere</div>"));
Is there any reason why this is not the default behaviour? Does this break something?
Firstly, I don't see how it would break much, except for type checks which rely on coercing jQuery objects into string, and matching text in that string. Am I wrong about this?
This returns the outerHTML
of all elements in a set, concatenated. Does this make any sense to anyone else? To me it makes quite a bit of sense.
var li, list;
$.fn.toString = function() {
var out;
out = [];
$.each(this, function(k, v) {
return out.push($(v)[0].outerHTML);
});
return out.join("\n");
};
list = $("<ul>\n <li>some <a href='/'>link</a> items</li>\n <li>some <a href='/'>link</a> items</li>\n <li>some <a href='/'>link</a> items</li>\n <li>some <a href='/'>link</a> items</li>\n <li>some <a href='/'>link</a> items</li>\n</ul>");
li = $("li", list);
console.log("The html of it..: " + li);
The toString() method returns a string representing the object.
The toString() method returns a string representing the source code of the specified Function .
String toString() Method in java with Examples Since toString() method simply returns the current string without any changes, there is no need to call the string explicitly, it is usually called implicitly. Parameter: The method does not accept any parameters . Return Value: This method returns the string itself.
Object.toString
returns a string representing the object (from the doc).
When talking about a jQuery object, the expected returned value for Object.toString
is "[object Object]"
.
Making it return HTML would simply be bad design, and could break stuff up.
Plus, it makes sense to have different explicit methods depending on what we want to retrieve from a jQuery object: .html()
for HTML, .text()
for stripping tags.
Well, jQuery object is home for lot more than just .html
.If jQuery had to implement the toString
, it should be generic enough to return based on the selector in jQuery object.
For example, If the selector picked multiple elements The version you have would simply return the first elements html content.
So what I am trying to say is that the toString
is not simple as you think and I couldn't think of any great usage for toString
as well.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With