I had a question.. Why do I have repeat what I have selected in the fetch method.
Date minDate = getDSLContext()
.select(CON_CAL_INSTANCE.DATE.min())
.from(CON_CAL_INSTANCE)
.join(CON_CAL_TEMPLATES)
.on(CON_CAL_INSTANCE.TEMPLATE_ID.eq(CON_CAL_TEMPLATES.ID))
.where(CON_CAL_TEMPLATES.ENTRY_TYPE.in("REPT", "HRPT"))
.fetchOne(CON_CAL_INSTANCE.DATE.min());
So I have provided CON_CAL_INSTANCE.DATE.min()
in my select clause, why do I have to repeat it in fetchOne(CON_CAL_INSTANCE.DATE.min())
?
Or am I not doing this right?
You're doing it right. The way the jOOQ DSL is constructed with Java generics, your ResultQuery<Record1<Date>>
doesn't "know" it is selecting only a single value, even if the ResultQuery
uses Record1
as a row type.
Apart from repeating the column, you have some other options:
ResultQuery<Record1<Date>> query = // ...
// Use two method calls (this may result in a NullPointerException!
// as fetchOne() may return null):
Date date1 = query.fetchOne().value1();
// Use fetchValue():
Date date2 = getDSLContext().fetchValue(query);
See also the DSLContext.fetchValue()
Javadoc.
On a side-note, there had been discussions in the past about using a more LINQ-style syntax in the jOOQ API:
from Table
where Predicates
select Projection
What may look like a good idea at first is raising new questions:
ORDER BY
, FOR UPDATE
clauses, which should still be placed after SELECT
. (See this post for details).UNION
, INTERSECT
and EXCEPT
.I've also written about the difference between lexical and logical order of operations in SQL, here
These open issues made us stick with the standard SQL syntax.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With