Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Jersey: Can not deserialize instance of ArrayList out of String

I have a json based REST Web Service implemented using: Jetty, Jersey, Jersey-JSON using Jackson.

One of my methods receives a Person instance, which has a field of type List<String>. i.e.:

Public class Person {
    List<String> names;
}

If I call it with an array of names, all works ok! e.g.:

{ "names" : [ "Jhon", "Doe" ] }

But if the person has only one name, my client creates a single value element, e.g.:

{ "names" : "Jhon" } 

When I try to call the service with a single value, I get an exception:

Can not deserialize instance of java.util.ArrayList out of VALUE_STRING token

Question:

How should I create/configure my web service, in order to be able to deserialize array field when they are sent to me as a single element.

--

I already read:

Jackson deserialization - with contained ArrayList<T>

and

How can I customize serialization of a list of JAXB objects to JSON?

and this that refer the last answer:

Jersey client can not deserializable json services - exception(can not deserialize instance)

Jaxb json missing brackets for one element array

But none of those fix the problem.

Thank you in advance!

like image 576
lpinto.eu Avatar asked Jan 14 '13 13:01

lpinto.eu


3 Answers

After a long day, and another... after reading lots of wikis and faqs, it finally works.

What I did:

  1. Use Jackson
  2. Force Jackson providers usage
  3. Define custom deserializer
  4. activate the ACCEPT_SINGLE_VALUE_AS_ARRAY flag
  5. Fix dependencies

The story:

I was using Jersey 1.13 that uses (I belive) jaxb by default.

I changed it to use Jackson

<init-param>
    <param-name>com.sun.jersey.api.json.POJOMappingFeature</param-name>
    <param-value>true</param-value>
</init-param>

as described at:

https://stackoverflow.com/a/13895768/660990

This made my jersey use jackson, but the problem remains; jackson can't deserializer the array yet.

I forced the usage of Jackson providers:

<init-param>
    <param-name>com.sun.jersey.config.property.packages</param-name>
    <param-value>
        your.project.packages;
        org.codehaus.jackson.jaxrs</param-value>
</init-param>

https://stackoverflow.com/a/3143214/660990

Was a needed step, but not enough. It's necessary to activate the ACCEPT_SINGLE_VALUE_AS_ARRAY flag.

ObjectMapper objectMapper;
objectMapper = new ObjectMapper().configure(DeserializationFeature.ACCEPT_SINGLE_VALUE_AS_ARRAY, true);

I needed define custom deserializer

public class MyResolver implements ContextResolver<ObjectMapper> {

@Override
    public ObjectMapper getContext(final Class<?> objectType) {
        ...            
        return objectMapper;
    }
}

in order to do that:

Customizing-ObjectMapper

After doing all of this it still didn't work...

After some more search time, I found:

Jackson 2.0 with Jersey 1.12

That discusses dependencies problems..

This reveled my problem, Jersey v1.13 ships with Jackson v1.9.2 I need Jackson v2.0

I removed dependency for jersey-json, because it included jackson 1.9.2:

<dependency>
    <groupId>com.sun.jersey</groupId>
    <artifactId>jersey-json</artifactId>
</dependency>

And directly declared dependency for:

<dependency>
    <groupId>com.fasterxml.jackson.jaxrs</groupId>
    <artifactId>jackson-jaxrs-json-provider</artifactId>
</dependency>

Reference:

jackson-jaxrs-json-provider

Note: this change removes the Jersey ability to use Jaxb or jettison.

Off topic, may be interesting for someone:

Configure Jersey/Jackson to NOT use @XmlElement field annotation for JSON field naming

like image 200
lpinto.eu Avatar answered Oct 31 '22 04:10

lpinto.eu


You can do this with annotations at class, field or method level using the JsonFormat annotation

@JsonFormat(with = Feature.ACCEPT_SINGLE_VALUE_AS_ARRAY)
protected List<String> list;

public List<String> getList() {
    return list;
}

public void setList(List<String> list) {
    this.list = list;
}
like image 42
steven35 Avatar answered Oct 31 '22 05:10

steven35


Example 5.10 and 5.11 of this page explain your exact problem. You can configure the JSON builder to force arrays for single-item lists, like so: JSONConfiguration.mapped().arrays("names").build().

like image 1
rmhartog Avatar answered Oct 31 '22 05:10

rmhartog