I saw I could return different types from the same function in JavaScript. Is this practice idiomatic or should it be discouraged?
For example:
somefn = function(e) {
switch (e.type)
{
case 'mousedown':
return false;
case 'mousemove':
return {x:10, y:20};
}
};
Please note that not only your function returns different types, but might even not return anything:
somefn({type: 'foo'}); //undefined
Although inconsistent return behavior described above is discouraged, returning different object types is common, although I can't say if it is idiomatic.
For the sake of readability and maintainability I wouldn't recommend returning completely different objects (like boolean and object literal in your example), but returning object literals with just slightly or even completely different properties is pretty common:
somefn = function(e) {
switch (e.type)
{
case 'mousedown':
return {x:10, y:20, down: false};
case 'mousemove':
return {x:10, y:20};
default:
return {};
}
};
I would discourage it. Any code that uses a function that can return different types depending on the context will have to check the returned value.
There are situations where it makes sense, however. Say you have a function that parses a string, for example JSON. In that situation it makes a whole lot of sense to return arrays if the input string is a JSON string representing an array, an object if the input contains an object, a boolean, a number, etc.
In general, do the thing that would cause the least surprise. Your example would surprise me a lot, for example.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With